TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Mon May 13, 2024 6:59 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3010 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1102 103 104 105 106151 Next

What's going to be the biggest surprise of 2016 season?
Ferrari beats Mercedes 11%  11%  [ 9 ]
Williams will stay 3rd in standings 14%  14%  [ 11 ]
McLaren Honda gets podium 37%  37%  [ 29 ]
No wet races 9%  9%  [ 7 ]
Maldonado and Palmer are incredibly reliable and scores in every race 5%  5%  [ 4 ]
People will not complain how boring it is 8%  8%  [ 6 ]
It isn't actually boring at all 16%  16%  [ 13 ]
Total votes: 79
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:17 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
http://imgur.com/a/7OGN9

Someone made a fictional standings + headlines for 2016 without Mercedes.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:04 pm 
Offline
Bronze Member
Bronze Member

Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:54 am
Posts: 568
Location: At home!
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 15 times
I've heard somewhere that the biggest issue with grass and gravel traps is that FIM (the motorbike federation) are reluctant to them, for bikes is much safer the use of tarmac. Even astroturfs are harmful to them (this year is the first time they are racing in Spielberg, that's why astroturfs were replaced by that red concrete or whatever). IMO sometimes is true but other times is not like that, there are many tracks that are not home to motorbikes races and still have big run-offs.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:58 pm 
Offline
Bronze Member
Bronze Member

Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:22 pm
Posts: 554
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 61 times
micha wrote:
http://imgur.com/a/7OGN9

Someone made a fictional standings + headlines for 2016 without Mercedes.

That's actually quite intriguing :D


Top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:12 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16150
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 942 times
2UncleanerLake53 wrote:
I've heard somewhere that the biggest issue with grass and gravel traps is that FIM (the motorbike federation) are reluctant to them, for bikes is much safer the use of tarmac. Even astroturfs are harmful to them (this year is the first time they are racing in Spielberg, that's why astroturfs were replaced by that red concrete or whatever). IMO sometimes is true but other times is not like that, there are many tracks that are not home to motorbikes races and still have big run-offs.


I thought gravel was better for riders and they used solely for decrease speeds of open wheelers

BTW that championship without Mercedes would be tast

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:08 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5806
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2769 times
Been thanked: 474 times
LucasWheldon wrote:
2UncleanerLake53 wrote:
I've heard somewhere that the biggest issue with grass and gravel traps is that FIM (the motorbike federation) are reluctant to them, for bikes is much safer the use of tarmac. Even astroturfs are harmful to them (this year is the first time they are racing in Spielberg, that's why astroturfs were replaced by that red concrete or whatever). IMO sometimes is true but other times is not like that, there are many tracks that are not home to motorbikes races and still have big run-offs.


I thought gravel was better for riders and they used solely for decrease speeds of open wheelers

BTW that championship without Mercedes would be tast


I think they went off gravel after someone broke his back bouncing over a raked gravel trap. Obviously they stopped raking it in the 90s (because it was also a good car launcher), but I think their minds were made up by that point.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:11 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 8057
Has thanked: 1465 times
Been thanked: 428 times
gkmotorsport wrote:
Scotty wrote:
gkmotorsport wrote:
I mean FFS, Hawkeye or the goal-line equivalent could be adapted for this.


Here are the reasons why it couldn't work.

- Those technologies cost squillions. To set up goal line tech in a soccer stadium costs more than $500,000 dollars AFAIK.

- Those technologies are still very slow.

- They only track 1 item at a time.

- Most of them work off tracking the parabolic path of an airborne ball.

- The biggest thing they track is a 30cm (or whatever) diameter soccer ball. I'm thinking tracking a 1.8m wide F1 car would be a massive challenge

- Unlike tennis, cricket and soccer, where the ball is the same for everyone, every car has a different size and shape.

The more you know.


Thank you, I didn't know it was that limited, comparitively speaking. And expensive!

Still, I would be amazed if software did not already exist that can study a moving image and tell a user when a pre-defined event is 'seen', such as an object within $widthRange being completely over $definedLine. There would probably be false positives, but this is why we have human stewards.

The general point being: if they want to enforce track limits reliably, it can't be as hard as they are making it look.


Brands has had trap cameras as paddock and bottom bend for years, Palmer installed them when he bought the tracks, there is a pressure plate on the grass and when a car runs over it the camera snaps a photo which is instantly displayed in race control, three strike snd you're out and fined, even stricter in testing.

Those didn't cos squillions, I think it was a few grand each which for an F1 track or the FIA is chump change, but as usual they can't be seen to be using an idea from a lowly club track so the FIA have to go a mega expensive complicated route to reinvent the wheel.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:20 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16150
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 942 times
gkmotorsport wrote:
I think they went off gravel after someone broke his back bouncing over a raked gravel trap. Obviously they stopped raking it in the 90s (because it was also a good car launcher), but I think their minds were made up by that point.


it was Waine Rainey, for bikes is complicated, as tarmac can't hold the speed after a crash either

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 1:23 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:58 pm
Posts: 3936
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 101 times
There is this italian guy that has a great youtube account. He's been covering LMP1s private tests, on Monza, for years so I'm one of his subscribers.

His lastest video appeared on my youtube page and it akwardly involves F1, something I stopped following since the beginning of 2015. It's a curious vid as the spray behind the rear wing is massive and likely the turbulent air will be big enough with such cars.

I hope this will void the effect of DRS and it takes F1 back to almost no overtaking(excluding the "wore tire" ones), so hopefully that will force Charlie/FIA to finally tackle the problem instead of circumventing it with dumb gimmicks like DRS.

F1s should be like F3s/LMP1s: relatively big spec diffuser(important to avoid designers managing vortices in the area) and short chord(which leads to low angles of attack) simplified wings. With that aero set, cars would be able to follow each other relatively close and racing would be decided by each driver's ability to overtake/defend, as F3/WEC clearly shows.

Wider tires is definitely a good step on the right direction, eventhough tire war would be very important to me too.

This new breed of cars are still quite heavy(the Sky vid says they will get even 22kg heavier) so I'm not sure the additional grip(wider tires and more downforce) will be enough to put them back to decent cornering speeds for an F1 car, though.

On one of the linked vids, Davidson says that they are currently taking Chapel at 105mph and that he predicts it be more like 130mph next year. Well, I very much doubt that as that would be ~20kmh faster than even pre-2014 cars :lol: But if that turns out to be real, maybe FPs/QLF will become worthy of watching for me again.


Top
PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:11 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 3155
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 335 times
Well that video is clearly an inaccurate test of the 2017 wets. That would be red flag conditions or trundle around behind the pace car for 20 laps. Come on Ferrari, do some more authentic testing.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:58 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5806
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2769 times
Been thanked: 474 times
A witty Facebook person, so probably stolen from Twitter wrote:
Image


Two things:

1. What on earth is he doing with his left hand?
2. Can a Finnish member please confirm that the new Mrs Raikkonen is in fact named after a strong liqueur? :lol:


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:59 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5806
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2769 times
Been thanked: 474 times
Image


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:57 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light Best Looking Member award winner
2011 TBK-Light Best Looking Member award winner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:02 pm
Posts: 11733
Location: 24 hours from Le Mans
Has thanked: 150 times
Been thanked: 546 times
gkmotorsport wrote:
A witty Facebook person, so probably stolen from Twitter wrote:
Image


Two things:

1. What on earth is he doing with his left hand?
2. Can a Finnish member please confirm that the new Mrs Raikkonen is in fact named after a strong liqueur? :lol:


Haha. Kimi's hooverhand game is strong. And yes, Mrs. Räikkönen is called Minttu.

Image


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:22 am 
Offline
The Finnish Paul Page
The Finnish Paul Page
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Racing is in my blood
Has thanked: 725 times
Been thanked: 563 times
Oh, yeah, even Kimi knows that one should be careful when touching Minttu. So hoovering hand is just a reflex.

_________________
"Indy doesn't give you a second chance. You have to earn it."


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:35 am 
Offline
Official TBK Rain Predictor
Official TBK Rain Predictor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:18 pm
Posts: 15420
Location: Quite rainy Antwerp
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 492 times
That's a very pretty woman.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 2:22 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5806
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2769 times
Been thanked: 474 times
Fabs wrote:
That's a very pretty woman.


I think this only serves to underline how much Kimi could barely crack a smile :lol:


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 2:57 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16150
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 942 times
imagine Kimi hitting on women just like he does his interviews

KR: "Hey"
random woman: "OMG Kimi Raikkonen! how are you?"
KR: "I don't know"

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:04 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5806
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2769 times
Been thanked: 474 times
LucasWheldon wrote:
imagine Kimi hitting on women just like he does his interviews

KR: "Hey"
random woman: "OMG Kimi Raikkonen! how are you?"
KR: "I don't know"


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:02 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:02 am
Posts: 5871
Location: 't Stad
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 614 times
Women get prettier when you have a lot of money.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:09 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 6:21 pm
Posts: 482
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 28 times
Omega wrote:
Women get prettier when you have a lot of money.


Or if you finish a bottle of that rocketfuel posted earlier.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 4:17 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16150
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Omega wrote:
Women get prettier when you have a lot of money.


so I guess Nigel Mansell drank a lot when he was single

and when he conceived his sons

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3010 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1102 103 104 105 106151 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: duck7, JJ and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited