TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:39 am

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6033 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1125 126 127 128 129302 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:10 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
The FIA are stuck between a rock and a hard place, plus I doubt any of us would be discussing the fuel-flow measuring unit had Red Bull not caused this situation.

The unit is a brand new technology and because of the rules that the FIA have set (in terms of testing restrictions), there is no way for the FIA to test the unit on track before rolling it out for general use. There has been reliability issues and some unreliable readings. However the FIA has confirmed the readings accuracy are only out by a few % and they are factoring those details in to how they manage the team's actual fuel usage. That's not a bad situation. And like I said, this would have been a non-issue and a non-discussion point had Red Bull not decided to obnoxiously take matters into their own hands. It would also have meant no-one here would have been critical of the FIA around this device.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:45 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
They mentioned during one of the practice session on SSF1 that Red Bull, STR & Lotus were the only 3 team that had been modifying there fuel flow sensors for packaging reasons & that they & Caterham were the 4 teams which were having 95% of the problems with the sensors.

Charlie Whiting has said that there will be no alterations to the fuel flow sensors allowed from the Spanish Gp.


Ted Kravitz also said that there had been some discussion that the fuel been used by Total which all Renault teams are using was causing some problems.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:18 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 pm
Posts: 93363
Location: New ribs please...
Has thanked: 398 times
Been thanked: 1339 times
RB made sure to tell everyone when they were having sensor issues after Australia.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:32 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
Gaara wrote:
RB made sure to tell everyone when they were having sensor issues after Australia.


During pre-season testing Red Bull made sure to tell everyone they were having issues with the Renault power-unit.

In 2013 Red Bull made sure to tell everyone they were having troubles with the Pirelli tyres.

In 2014 Red Bull are making sure they tell everyone they are having trouble accepting the rules.

There's a common theme here.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:35 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:21 am
Posts: 6404
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 653 times
kals wrote:
there is no way for the FIA to test the unit on track before rolling it out for general use.


They could have required fitting of the sensors on all cars and monitored the readings but not introduced the fuel flow limit until they were confident the sensors were performing accurately. A pretty logical thing to do really, and I doubt it would have any negative impact on competition over what we have at the moment.

_________________
Image


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:37 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
Philthy82 wrote:
kals wrote:
there is no way for the FIA to test the unit on track before rolling it out for general use.


They could have required fitting of the sensors on all cars and monitored the readings but not introduced the fuel flow limit until they were confident the sensors were performing accurately. A pretty logical thing to do really, and I doubt it would have any negative impact on competition over what we have at the moment.


But what do we have? Really? What we have is one team trying (and failing) to cause trouble. Almost every other team has had issues but none of them have made anything of it.

This really isn't a bad situation. Like I said in my original post, this would be a non-issue if it weren't for Red Bull's shenanigans.

By the way Philthy, hope all is ok with you.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:54 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:21 am
Posts: 6404
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 653 times
All good, thanks mate :thumbsup:

_________________
Image


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:18 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
There talking about lifting the ban on active suspension to cut costs?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/113465

Quote:
The belief is that the electronic technology would actually be more cost effective for teams in terms of achieving the optimum car set-up than the current complicated mechanical-only systems.

The move is being considered for 2017, and could come in at the same time as a switch to 18-inch tyre rims.

AUTOSPORT understands that a number of other short and long-term proposals are being evaluated by the Strategy Group for implementation over the next few years.

They include efforts to simplify parts of the car where there is currently vast expense, including in the fuel system, crash structures, the front wing design, inter-connected front and rear suspension, and brake ducts.

There could also be tweaks to the GP weekend curfew hours and further reductions on staff numbers allowed at races.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:37 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:45 pm
Posts: 2821
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 42 times
2017 will be switch to 18 inch tyres????
Why cant FIA understand that these things cost again big cash. New suspension, arms, brakes etc...
And it all gets heavier, so imagine a crash happens and a wheel comes loose and hits the driver...
Imagine a scene like Surtees fatal crash from F2. I think its not good to make this changes to the wheels.
And again cars will get heavier and heavier trough the years and the drivers thinner and thinner..


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:56 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
alex1369 wrote:
2017 will be switch to 18 inch tyres????
Why cant FIA understand that these things cost again big cash. New suspension, arms, brakes etc...
And it all gets heavier, so imagine a crash happens and a wheel comes loose and hits the driver...
Imagine a scene like Surtees fatal crash from F2. I think its not good to make this changes to the wheels.
And again cars will get heavier and heavier trough the years and the drivers thinner and thinner..


There's going to be a bit of give and take here. There will be more composite with the wheel but less tyre. Flying wheels isn't a new thing and while Henry Surtees incident was sad, that kind of incident is thankfully a very rare occurrence.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:44 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
alex1369 wrote:
2017 will be switch to 18 inch tyres????
Why cant FIA understand that these things cost again big cash. New suspension, arms, brakes etc...
Its just a proposal for now although it is something Pirelli have been pushing for.

The active suspension proposal is coming from the teams rather than the FIA.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:24 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:56 am
Posts: 11371
Has thanked: 5008 times
Been thanked: 295 times
Yeah, this may help close te gap to Red Bull, they still are the fastest car, just lack an engine. Who knows, I always like to see something new just for the sake of it.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:33 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16091
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 936 times
they should make the rule like this

"all cars are free to have active suspension, except those designed by Adrian Newey"

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:27 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:52 pm
Posts: 3542
Location: Cambridge
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 34 times
kals wrote:
alex1369 wrote:
2017 will be switch to 18 inch tyres????
Why cant FIA understand that these things cost again big cash. New suspension, arms, brakes etc...
And it all gets heavier, so imagine a crash happens and a wheel comes loose and hits the driver...
Imagine a scene like Surtees fatal crash from F2. I think its not good to make this changes to the wheels.
And again cars will get heavier and heavier trough the years and the drivers thinner and thinner..

There's going to be a bit of give and take here. There will be more composite with the wheel but less tyre. Flying wheels isn't a new thing and while Henry Surtees incident was sad, that kind of incident is thankfully a very rare occurrence.

On this topic, for those who may have missed it; this close-call happened a few weeks back...



Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:35 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
Oh wow!

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:38 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16091
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 936 times
damn those cars doesn't have that cable that holds the wheel into the chassis?

if that thing went a few cm to the left he'd broke his neck

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 pm
Posts: 93363
Location: New ribs please...
Has thanked: 398 times
Been thanked: 1339 times
There's only so much the tethers can take.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:59 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:58 pm
Posts: 3936
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 101 times
micha wrote:
And if you're around my age you remember them as a struggling team in the early 90's who became great once Schumacher and his men joined them.
Not that I'm going to ignore their past but from my point of view, McLaren and Williams are just as important to F1.

Yeah, I started watching in early 90's and the big teams/cars in my head were Williams and Mclaren. Ferrari was just another midfielder.

StefMeister wrote:
Its just a proposal for now although it is something Pirelli have been pushing for.


I don't know about Pirelli, but Michelin surely said they would like that for a possible comeback.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:25 am 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:32 pm
Posts: 4318
Location: Walsall, United Kingdom
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 45 times
Whoa, the tyre completely flattened the right mirror there!


Top
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:35 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5789
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2747 times
Been thanked: 474 times
The plans for bigger rims have been floating and sinking for several years now. Bridgestone ruled it out because of the re-tooling costs, but I believe both Michelin and Pirelli have been more open to the idea - particularly Michelin, who already produce low-profile tyres for a lot of other categories.

The active suspension call has surprised me, though. I guess it would save money compared to when it was last in F1, as the cost of implementing the electronics and/or hydraulics must be much lower now. Trimming the aerodynamics a little bit more should prevent lap times from getting out of hand, too.


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6033 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1125 126 127 128 129302 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited