TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sat May 18, 2024 11:41 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 299 posts ]  Go to page Previous 111 12 13 14 15 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline
Moderator - Shareholder
Moderator - Shareholder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:05 am
Posts: 10060
Has thanked: 432 times
Been thanked: 519 times
Gaara wrote:
No, I think the bumper bar is low enough that the car probably wouldn't go underneath it, or it would at least have slowed it to a stop. Besides, it's not as sharp as the edge of the ramp is and the helmet most likely would stand up better.


The bumper on these trucks are pretty high. If you sit on the ground your head is around level with it.They often have areo panels on the side to streamline them a bit, but those are just panels on the side. Helmets can stand up well but still have serious consequences - Henry Surtress impact was as blunt as it came unfortunately.

Edit: Fixed my broken quotes.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 pm
Posts: 93684
Location: New ribs please...
Has thanked: 398 times
Been thanked: 1344 times
Apparently she's still critical but the surgeons are pleased with her overnight progress and seems there's no swelling on the brain.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:56 pm 
Offline
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:05 am
Posts: 593
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 5 times
Tobias wrote:
someone is going to be in trouble over this. Although the truck could not move forward any more.

Image


I am pretty sure that the truck on the lower right hand side, the one that she hit is not capable of loading of a car. I believe this transporter carries the tents and other gear.. Is this truck apart of the team or a hired company that might not have the same safety procedures.

I believe that the cars trailer and team trailer is the on the upper left side of the picture that has the tail gate down and leads into the tent itself.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:11 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:59 am
Posts: 3198
Has thanked: 573 times
Been thanked: 53 times
You're probably right. I didn't think that.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:06 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:21 am
Posts: 6413
Has thanked: 411 times
Been thanked: 653 times
Ian-S wrote:
who would have thought an experienced racing driver would forget to engage neutral when coming to a stop...?


Mind telling me where you're getting this info from, or is it just bullshit speculation like everything else in this thread?

_________________
Image


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:11 am 
Offline
Champion GIF Maker
Champion GIF Maker
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 3554
Location: My balloon !
Has thanked: 444 times
Been thanked: 117 times
Probably from ear-witnesses who heard the car accelerate suddendly, which is PROBABLY due to the anti-stall system kicking in. That would have been avoided had she engaged neutral near the tent.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:28 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 8057
Has thanked: 1465 times
Been thanked: 428 times
Philthy82 wrote:
Ian-S wrote:
who would have thought an experienced racing driver would forget to engage neutral when coming to a stop...?


Mind telling me where you're getting this info from, or is it just bullshit speculation like everything else in this thread?


Listen to the audio, it's very informative.

I'll apologise for using my 30 years experience to form an opinion if I'm wrong, however if I am correct, I'll expect one from you for your attitude.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:30 am 
Offline
Founder of the Yaytree
Founder of the Yaytree
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 28241
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not near DEGA :( )
Has thanked: 1304 times
Been thanked: 1873 times
F1 detectives ITT

I'd echo what someone posted earlier though, maybe this accident will lead to the FIA to look into Visor-area helmet safety and see if anything can be done to beef that up.

Obviously it's always going to be a compromise between clear vision to avoid accidents vs strong visor to prevent the ones that happen but its obviously something to think about after accidents like this happen.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:39 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:21 am
Posts: 6413
Has thanked: 411 times
Been thanked: 653 times
Ian-S wrote:
Philthy82 wrote:
Ian-S wrote:
who would have thought an experienced racing driver would forget to engage neutral when coming to a stop...?


Mind telling me where you're getting this info from, or is it just bullshit speculation like everything else in this thread?


Listen to the audio, it's very informative.

I'll apologise for using my 30 years experience to form an opinion if I'm wrong, however if I am correct, I'll expect one from you for your attitude.


LOL, sure I'll apologise for suggesting it's wrong for couch jockeys to criticise a comatose driver for an alleged mistake theorised out of vague evidence available on the interwebs.

_________________
Image


Last edited by Philthy82 on Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:49 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 8057
Has thanked: 1465 times
Been thanked: 428 times
Philthy82 wrote:
Ian-S wrote:
Philthy82 wrote:

Mind telling me where you're getting this info from, or is it just bullshit speculation like everything else in this thread?


Listen to the audio, it's very informative.

I'll apologise for using my 30 years experience to form an opinion if I'm wrong, however if I am correct, I'll expect one from you for your attitude.


LOL, sure I'll apologise for suggesting it's wrong for couch jockeys to criticise a comatose driver for an alleged mistake theorised out of vague evidence available on the interwebs.


That's a nice and varied vocabulary you've got there.

I don't remember criticising her either.

As for anti-stall Scotty, it depends on what kind of system they're running, most systems (in F1) will take over throttle control, usually engaging it to 40-50% and drag the clutch (hence the bullshit speculation based on witness accounts & audio) to which the driver must over-ride the anti-stall programming, usually by pressing a button on the steering wheel. It will only fully engage the clutch to release drive after 10 seconds (as per the FIA regulations).

I would expect the audio will be a key piece on the investigation too, what may be jumbled noise to one person, could be vital information to another.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:36 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:21 am
Posts: 9244
Location: Chile
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 275 times
Just managed to read today about Maria's condition. This fucking sucks. I'm so sad for her.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:10 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 8057
Has thanked: 1465 times
Been thanked: 428 times
I don't know the specifics but I think they just banned IRM rather than banning fly-by-wire altogether.

Edit, the ECU is a spec system from McLaren isn't it? But I think they can run different "approved" software on it, so yeah I'm pretty sure they just banned the ECU from running different engine mapping based on where the throttle pedal was, I'm 90% sure the only time they can run different maps now is when the anti-stall kicks in, or what I think they call idle-control (choke to anybody over 40 :lol:)


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:27 am 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:47 am
Posts: 2517
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 77 times
So some of you would rather die than lose an eye? Huh...

I hope I misunderstood.

My Grandfather lost his sight completely in his teens, and has lived a perfectly full life regardless of it all the way into his 90's now. It sucks, but as long as she's ok otherwise after what happened, she should count herself as nothing except for extremely fortunate.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:35 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 8057
Has thanked: 1465 times
Been thanked: 428 times
Starlancer wrote:
I hope I misunderstood..


Well that would make two of us then, cos I didn't understand that attitude either.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:20 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:26 am
Posts: 5303
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Has thanked: 254 times
Been thanked: 262 times
Starlancer wrote:
So some of you would rather die than lose an eye? Huh...

I hope I misunderstood.


I think you did. Some said before that surviving sometimes isn't a good thing considering the sequelae. Anyway, I think it isn't exactly the case of being 'happy' for her survival giving the consequences of the accident.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:21 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:05 pm
Posts: 2117
Location: Åland/Vaasa
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 96 times
Personally, I think she'd prefer living before dying. It is just bullshit speculation from my part though.

_________________
I shagged a couple of loose balls for her in warmups.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:41 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8767
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 617 times
Been thanked: 836 times
I think that the forum reactions preferring death to sequels were posted before we knew the extent of her injuries. There could have been worse brain damage, and starting from some point of incapacity it is legitimate to wonder if you'd rather live or die.

I read somewhere that in general, even people who fear handicap the most usually cope a lot better with catastrophic injuries than you would expect them to.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:12 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:58 am
Posts: 3381
Location: Bruges, Belgium, Joined Mon May 12, 2003 5:27 pm
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 77 times
about rather being dead or alive... it's difficult to draw a line. Loosing one eye is not a reason for that. Being paralyzed for the rest of your life is another story.

But everyone seems to forget there is more than just yourself. Remember your family/friends/children, I'do basically everything to be alive for my kids and/or family. Even if I'd have to be chained to a wheelchair for the rest of my life for example.

But again, totally paralyzed, or not able to communicate anymore is another story.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:32 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 8057
Has thanked: 1465 times
Been thanked: 428 times
Scotty wrote:
Ian-S wrote:
I don't know the specifics but I think they just banned IRM rather than banning fly-by-wire altogether.


I thought fly-by-wire was banned back in the early naughties actually, but I'm splitting hairs here. I'm sure the real experts know what happened.


Is it Matt that works at one of the teams? maybe he can confirm, I'm pretty sure the throttle is connected to the ECU which controls the engine, there's no actual physical connection between the throttle and the fuel injection system (no throttle cable so to speak, hence the nickname 32bit throttle). That's how the hot blowing diffusers worked, the driver would hit a button to change the engine mapping (or it was done automatically), when he lifted off the throttle, the ECU would keep the throttle open but dial back the torque to virtually nothing, then the mapping would then adjust back to "power" setting when he hit the throttle again. When the FIA banned blown diffusers, they didn't really ban them because they were only ever bit of software, not a physical item, so they banned engine mapping adjustments while at speed and made the teams match engine torque to throttle position, that made the hot blown diffuser concept impossible to attain overnight, moving the exhaust covered the other ways it was possible to user a hot blown diffuser, or closed a loophole the teams could have used.

The reason I'm a bit sceptical about the clutch being fully engaged in anti-stall, is because when we've seen it happen, it sounds like the ECU takes over throttle control and drags the clutch, I'm not sure that having the clutch fully engage at full throttle because the revs have dropped low would either do the engine a lot of good, or be a great idea with all the cars behind (both the throttle and clutch would need to be controlled artificially to avoid damage), in comparison it would be like the car that has anti-stall active would be braking compared to the others. There's a clause in the regulations that says see appendix blah blah regarding this, basically the ECU must shutdown the engine after 10 seconds if certain parameters are met, there's also some other stuff in there about the medical light in the cockpit is tied to the ADL and ECU and all 3 have to work in unison.

Anyway yeah, splitting hairs which is fine with me, we could talk about our theories on how the ECU works for weeks I don't mind, at least we're not speculating about Maria, blaming her or saying anything that might be upsetting for GenX... :lol:


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light Funniest member award winner
2011 TBK-Light Funniest member award winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:24 pm
Posts: 4806
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 97 times
I think everyone's dead/alive line will come at a different point, based on your outlook on life (postive/negative) and what you've got to live for. I think at some points the fear of what life might be like may be worse than the reality.


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 299 posts ]  Go to page Previous 111 12 13 14 15 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited