TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:00 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 9
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:45 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:21 am
Posts: 6404
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 653 times
All I want is more short tracks and road courses, and I think the rest will take care of itself. A lot of the tracks on the current calendar (1.5 mile cookie cutters mainly) are seriously stale.

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:23 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15439
Has thanked: 861 times
Been thanked: 639 times
I think the tyres play a major part, if Goodyear keeps bringing rocks to every race there won't be much improvement on the current situation.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:31 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 3:32 am
Posts: 3769
Location: Bardstown,KY
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 202 times
Well, I probably watched nearly every damn Cup race live from '97-2004, at least. There were good races then, and there were bad. I've seen many older races than that, there's good ones and bad.

Whatever it is, I just can't make myself give a damn about this season. I've watched a grand total of 25 laps combined from the last two races, and I felt like I haven't missed a damn thing. Don't know why, but it just feels that way.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 9080
Location: New Milford, CT
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 301 times
Definitely agree we need a softer tire and more short track/road courses.

_________________
Go Miami Dolphins!
Go New York Yankees!
Go New York Rangers!


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:22 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:03 pm
Posts: 2654
Location: Mooresville, NC - Tampa, FL
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 304 times
We've always had the 1.5 mile tracks on the schedule, and they have definitely put on some amazing races. It isn't the tracks, it's the combination of the tires and the COT.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:47 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:29 am
Posts: 5195
Location: Missoula, MT (from a social distance, of course)
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 69 times
Jeff wrote:
Well, I probably watched nearly every damn Cup race live from '97-2004, at least. There were good races then, and there were bad. I've seen many older races than that, there's good ones and bad.

Whatever it is, I just can't make myself give a damn about this season. I've watched a grand total of 25 laps combined from the last two races, and I felt like I haven't missed a damn thing. Don't know why, but it just feels that way.

You and me both. I didn't see a lap of the race at Texas, and I feel like I'm just watching bits and pieces of races now.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:27 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:21 pm
Posts: 3761
Has thanked: 319 times
Been thanked: 287 times
zippy wrote:
We've always had the 1.5 mile tracks on the schedule, and they have definitely put on some amazing races. It isn't the tracks, it's the combination of the tires and the COT.

I think it was ok when you had Charlotte, Atlanta and Michigan be the only downforce tracks on the schedule so teams didn't give them any more importance than the other tracks but with more than half the schedule being those tracks now, teams have scienced out the setups to the nth degree to make every use of aerodynamics possible. You look at the attitude of the cars at these tracks in the 80s and 90s and the front would be high up in the air, bobbing around over the bumps and clearly not optimized for best downforce but that meant they could run closer to each other (which is what people refer to when talking about better racing in those days, not statistically closer racing necessarily) unlike today when they're all neatly glued to the ground and lose grip as soon as they get close to each other. How do you forget that knowledge now? You can't, so shorties and roadies are the only way to get away from that since the speeds are so low, aero will never be a big factor and it will always be more about the driver manhandling the car to get the best out of it at those places.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:36 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:05 am
Posts: 2841
Location: Louisville, KY
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 275 times
Sandeep Banerjee wrote:
zippy wrote:
We've always had the 1.5 mile tracks on the schedule, and they have definitely put on some amazing races. It isn't the tracks, it's the combination of the tires and the COT.

I think it was ok when you had Charlotte, Atlanta and Michigan be the only downforce tracks on the schedule so teams didn't give them any more importance than the other tracks but with more than half the schedule being those tracks now, teams have scienced out the setups to the nth degree to make every use of aerodynamics possible. You look at the attitude of the cars at these tracks in the 80s and 90s and the front would be high up in the air, bobbing around over the bumps and clearly not optimized for best downforce but that meant they could run closer to each other (which is what people refer to when talking about better racing in those days, not statistically closer racing necessarily) unlike today when they're all neatly glued to the ground and lose grip as soon as they get close to each other. How do you forget that knowledge now? You can't, so shorties and roadies are the only way to get away from that since the speeds are so low, aero will never be a big factor and it will always be more about the driver manhandling the car to get the best out of it at those places.

This post nailed it. Aerodynamics are killing the ability to run close in the corners. Combine that with cars that are very equal on both the straightaways and the corners and it's almost impossible to pass and things get spread out in a hurry.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:37 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:57 pm
Posts: 2865
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 73 times
You no longer see drivers lose the car on their own and spin it back into the wall. Now, a slight correction of the steering wheel saves the car. The cars just seem so damn stable these days, and rather slide around when handing becomes a huge issue.

_________________
Quote:
TBK Light's 2013 ARCA pick 'ems champion!

Quote:
For the second year in a row, OldAsphalt takes the ARCA pick 'ems crown!


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:19 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:21 am
Posts: 6404
Has thanked: 410 times
Been thanked: 653 times
I think aero plays a part, which makes me slightly concerned about the return to sleeker bodyshapes. But why didn't the boxier COT achieve the goals of reducing aero push/loose and overall closer competition it was intended to? With the upright windshields and higher noses the expectation was for more truck or early 90's cup-style racing, but we never got that. Maybe the tyres and shock rules play a much bigger part than we realise.

_________________
Image


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:44 am 
Offline
Moderator - Shareholder
Moderator - Shareholder
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:05 am
Posts: 10060
Has thanked: 432 times
Been thanked: 519 times
Philthy82 wrote:
I think aero plays a part, which makes me slightly concerned about the return to sleeker bodyshapes. But why didn't the boxier COT achieve the goals of reducing aero push/loose and overall closer competition it was intended to? With the upright windshields and higher noses the expectation was for more truck or early 90's cup-style racing, but we never got that. Maybe the tyres and shock rules play a much bigger part than we realise.


Well something that always struck me as a bit odd was they wanted aerodynamics to have less of an effect when cars were following each other. But then they gave the car a splitter which made them more aero sensitive on the front. Seemed a bit backwards to me.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:25 am 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 1:36 am
Posts: 1337
Location: "The Legend of teh Long Lost Airbornez"
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 22 times
I agree with everything said. I remember some good races on the 1.5 miles tracks back in the day. I used to look forward to The Winston/All Star at Charlotte. We're set up for a complete farce this season if the racing is going to stay like this.

Anyways, gotta be a combination of the hard tires and COT for sure. The COT has been around a while now but it seems the teams have finally mastered it this season. I think the Nationwide car is suffering from the same things as the Cup car now. It's taken away the excitement of seeing guys on the edge. It seems like the cars are just glued to the track with no fear of ever losing control. Sure they get loose but they snap right back into place. That's gotta be the key reason that cautions are down 44% this year. I vote for the shorter spoiler at ALL tracks not just Dega/Tona.

Even short tracks aren't safe from bad racing. Bristol and Martinsville had moments where it just wasn't fun. I watched the tape delayed broadcast of the K&N Bristol race on SPEED last week and talk about old school, I really miss those cars, slipping and sliding and really battling hard through the field. Maybe we can get back to that with a few changes and some tires that actually wear out. The trucks still seem to race a little better but of course we get plenty of letdowns.

Richmond this weekend... Last Fall it was carnage but the year before that they ran 400 laps with only three cautions (debris, single car spin, rain). Let's hope it's not a complete snoozer like that one.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:21 pm
Posts: 3761
Has thanked: 319 times
Been thanked: 287 times
Philthy82 wrote:
I think aero plays a part, which makes me slightly concerned about the return to sleeker bodyshapes. But why didn't the boxier COT achieve the goals of reducing aero push/loose and overall closer competition it was intended to? With the upright windshields and higher noses the expectation was for more truck or early 90's cup-style racing, but we never got that. Maybe the tyres and shock rules play a much bigger part than we realise.

A friend of mine talked to a front-running Cup driver who said the real problem even before going to the COT was not the body but these coilbind/bumpstop setups under the car that had you running on virtually solid springs and almost totally dependent on aerodynamic downforce for majority of the grip. The COT didn't reduce the downforce dependency of the chassis that was brought about by these type of setups but instead reduced the total available downforce on the car. That's like giving a man a smaller fish instead of teaching him how to fish, lol. What's worse is the COT moved the distribution of the downforce more toward the back which meant it was even worse in dirty air and all drivers complained of no front grip and unable to turn. On top of all this, the top-heavy nature of the car made it abuse tyres which meant hard tyres became the necessity at many tracks. It's a pretty sad comedy of errors really and a very tall order for the 2013 car to fix but we can hope.


Top
 Post subject: Re: Cup, Trucks @ Kansas
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:42 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:50 pm
Posts: 4083
Location: SuperModified Country...
Has thanked: 90 times
Been thanked: 337 times
Philthy82 wrote:
I think aero plays a part, which makes me slightly concerned about the return to sleeker bodyshapes. But why didn't the boxier COT achieve the goals of reducing aero push/loose and overall closer competition it was intended to? With the upright windshields and higher noses the expectation was for more truck or early 90's cup-style racing, but we never got that. Maybe the tyres and shock rules play a much bigger part than we realise.


At the end of the day the golden rule that the teams are always smarter than the sanctioning body applies. The more the sanction tries to tighten the rules to produce equality, the more the good teams will get clever and eek out that last little bit of performance to gain an advantage to circumvent the newest rule. The CoT, and the racing as a by product of that, are no different.

Once the teams get there brains around the new car, it'll be business as usual. Fewer 1.5 mile bore factories and fewer rules governing, nay, dictating the racing, are needed to get NASCAR back to where it was when we all made Sunday's an armchair afternoon.


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 174 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 9

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MotoKris1, Tristar 7AT, ZeroX and 87 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited