TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 8:17 am

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 403 posts ]  Go to page Previous 117 18 19 20 21 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 12:08 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
Statement from Pirelli:
http://f1pressarea.pirelli.com/wp-conte ... oriale2015

Quote:
In November 2013, Pirelli requested that there should be rules to govern the maximum number of laps that can be driven on the same set of tyres, among other parameters to do with correct tyre usage. The proposal put forward a maximum distance equivalent to 50% of the grand prix distance for the prime tyre and 30% for the option. These conditions, if applied today at Spa, would have limited the maximum number of laps on the medium compound to 22.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 6:07 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 3149
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 335 times
I for one have just about had enough of all this kerb hoping. The kerbs ARE NOT part of the designated race track. The distance between white lines are. The kerbs are there solely as a safety measure/reference point. Its about time higher raised and more serrated kerbs are bought back. That would ensure that the track limits are respected.

As for a safety issue? I did not see one single mistake that made a driver go onto the kerbs because of ballsing up a corner. Mistakes were made cause drivers were abusing the kerbs and running over them (thinking Ricciardo and the GP2/3 crash)

Now imagine just how much of a challenge Eau Rouge would be if there was a big serrated kerb there and drivers had to drive between the white lines. It wouldn't be flat that's for sure. I can even deal with the acres of tarmac run off as a safety measure if there was a honking great big kerb on ever corner.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 9:31 am 
Offline
Bronze Member
Bronze Member

Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:22 pm
Posts: 554
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 61 times
webbsy wrote:
I for one have just about had enough of all this kerb hoping. The kerbs ARE NOT part of the designated race track. The distance between white lines are. The kerbs are there solely as a safety measure/reference point. Its about time higher raised and more serrated kerbs are bought back. That would ensure that the track limits are respected.

As for a safety issue? I did not see one single mistake that made a driver go onto the kerbs because of ballsing up a corner. Mistakes were made cause drivers were abusing the kerbs and running over them (thinking Ricciardo and the GP2/3 crash)

Now imagine just how much of a challenge Eau Rouge would be if there was a big serrated kerb there and drivers had to drive between the white lines. It wouldn't be flat that's for sure. I can even deal with the acres of tarmac run off as a safety measure if there was a honking great big kerb on ever corner.

I agree with this, minus the acceptance for tarmac run offs. If you put grass there, then drivers can't exceed the track limits anymore. They will get dirty tyres, kick up dust. Which would make racing also more spectacular again. Plus, more interesting kerbs. Now they are standardized. Even the brilliant Monza kerbs are gone, where the cars used to get airborne.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 10:44 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:02 am
Posts: 5823
Location: 't Stad
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 607 times
FIA is concerned about safety, not spectacle.
I would like to see walls next to the track too, and worse breaks, and tyres that might or might not keep it together, and no tarmac run-off. It is killing the sport, but I will never believe for one moment that FIA will sacrifice a part of increased safety measures to improve the show again.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 11:49 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:48 pm
Posts: 10348
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 280 times
The drivers cut the corners so much and never respect the limits. It always makes me think that we're going to have loads of accidents when they race at Monaco, or anywhere that still has gravel and barriers close to the track, but that never happens. So either the drivers take more risks with big run offs, because they know they can get away with it, or they could make the corner if they really wanted to, but always take the easy way out. Either way, it arguably reduces driving standards and the general challenge massively.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 12:01 pm 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15439
Has thanked: 861 times
Been thanked: 639 times
give the drivers a foot of extra track and they will use it - only way to stop it is to take it away

can't raise the kerbs because ramps
can't put walls closer because crashes and rebounding
can't use gravel traps because drivers might be out of the race if they enter

mistakes should be punished, skill should be rewarded - this is F1


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 1:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 pm
Posts: 93342
Location: New ribs please...
Has thanked: 398 times
Been thanked: 1338 times
All they had to do with gravel traps was allow drivers who spin off into it to be recovered. They're plenty punished by the time it takes to dig them out again.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 1:51 pm 
Offline
Founder of the Yaytree
Founder of the Yaytree
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 28079
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not near DEGA :( )
Has thanked: 1287 times
Been thanked: 1865 times
Which is how it works in american racing.

I have dim memories of da matta spinning off at mid ohio in i think 2002, getting stuck in the gravel and the caution coming out to retrieve him.
He went on to score points albeit a lap down.
It was the first time I realised the difference between the us and European mentality when it came to car recovery and I liked it better that way

_________________
RIP Birmingham Wheels: here's some of the crash videos I recorded when it was there:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIaKIE ... 5t9d5PvoHA

Twitter:

http://www.twitter.com/paulhadsley


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 2:10 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5789
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2747 times
Been thanked: 474 times
codename_47 wrote:
Which is how it works in american racing.

I have dim memories of da matta spinning off at mid ohio in i think 2002, getting stuck in the gravel and the caution coming out to retrieve him.
He went on to score points albeit a lap down.
It was the first time I realised the difference between the us and European mentality when it came to car recovery and I liked it better that way


This is probably the most sensible option - cars get stopped properly, they don't sit in the gravel and create a hazard, marshalls are protected, and the race doesn't lose a car.

Of course, it would also lead to more complaints about cautions ruining the racing ;)


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:15 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:02 am
Posts: 5823
Location: 't Stad
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 607 times
a race like yesterday in Pocono with 11 or more cautions wouldn't work in F1.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:45 pm 
Offline
Founder of the Yaytree
Founder of the Yaytree
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 28079
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not near DEGA :( )
Has thanked: 1287 times
Been thanked: 1865 times
gkmotorsport wrote:
codename_47 wrote:
Which is how it works in american racing.

I have dim memories of da matta spinning off at mid ohio in i think 2002, getting stuck in the gravel and the caution coming out to retrieve him.
He went on to score points albeit a lap down.
It was the first time I realised the difference between the us and European mentality when it came to car recovery and I liked it better that way


This is probably the most sensible option - cars get stopped properly, they don't sit in the gravel and create a hazard, marshalls are protected, and the race doesn't lose a car.

Of course, it would also lead to more complaints about cautions ruining the racing ;)


I've always hated that argument, particularly from the sportscar crowd, who think they have a monopoly on "purism"

I'd much rather a few sc periods to clean up incidents properly than either a permanent yellow at a section of track or even worse a rush job done under waved yellows which could lead to debris or oil not being cleared up sufficiently and further problems later on.

But no, people like to shout about how their series is not artificial compared to others because their marshals and drivers are put In harms way more to keep their races green. REAL RACING! :roll:

Caution periods are part of racing, life itself is a bit of a lottery, motorsport fans just need to get over it and realise they're going to happen eventually and they don't ruin races.
And only really nascar uses them for show.

_________________
RIP Birmingham Wheels: here's some of the crash videos I recorded when it was there:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIaKIE ... 5t9d5PvoHA

Twitter:

http://www.twitter.com/paulhadsley


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 4:03 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5789
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2747 times
Been thanked: 474 times
codename_47 wrote:
I've always hated that argument, particularly from the sportscar crowd, who think they have a monopoly on "purism"

I'd much rather a few sc periods to clean up incidents properly than either a permanent yellow at a section of track or even worse a rush job done under waved yellows which could lead to debris or oil not being cleared up sufficiently and further problems later on.

But no, people like to shout about how their series is not artificial compared to others because their marshals and drivers are put In harms way more to keep their races green. REAL RACING! :roll:

Caution periods are part of racing, life itself is a bit of a lottery, motorsport fans just need to get over it and realise they're going to happen eventually and they don't ruin races.
And only really nascar uses them for show.


Tbh I think a lot of people equate 'caution period' with 'NASCAR-style invisibris', as in an attempt to artificially spice up the show. I don't think it has ever really been used that way in F1, but maybe steps could be taken to speed up the process so that we don't end up with several laps on a clear track.


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:41 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
It appears that Pastor was the master of his own demise from the Belgian GP - http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/120475

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:28 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16086
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 936 times
he ran out of money perhaps?

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:53 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:34 pm
Posts: 2347
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 24 times
kals wrote:
It appears that Pastor was the master of his own demise from the Belgian GP - http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/120475

Think the coverage just caught him going over the kerbs at Eau Rouge, one of the things FOM chose not to replay, along with Verstappens overtake round the outside of Blanchimont. Not sure I'd call it a massive off, several drivers did the same thing in free practice with no problems. Think maybe the Lotus team have had enough of Pastor this season


Top
PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:56 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
gd49 wrote:
kals wrote:
It appears that Pastor was the master of his own demise from the Belgian GP - http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/120475

Think the coverage just caught him going over the kerbs at Eau Rouge, one of the things FOM chose not to replay, along with Verstappens overtake round the outside of Blanchimont. Not sure I'd call it a massive off, several drivers did the same thing in free practice with no problems. Think maybe the Lotus team have had enough of Pastor this season


Yeah I get the impression from Permane's interview that he's a little frustrated. Pastor's money has been useful to Lotus these past couple of year's, but they've barely any return to show from it other than a lot of damage. I wonder if the damage is equal to if not more than the money that Pastor brings to Lotus?

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:25 am 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:42 am
Posts: 1423
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 65 times
codename_47 wrote:
acopip wrote:
Did Alonso pass 5, 6 cars there?


Bit late, but I think he passed at least 106 cars at the start :p

hehe :lol:
Great start really, just watched it again :thumbsup:


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 8:42 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:56 pm
Posts: 4869
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 100 times
Omega wrote:
What did Vettel do? Retire? Pit for a new tyre?


Coming to the pits, he crossed the timing line about 12 seconds before Hamilton came to chequered flag. So even if they had replaced the tyre there was not much sense to drive one more lap.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 4:41 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
Gary Anderson wrote:
While I'm on about track limits, I listened to Sebastian Vettel's rant after the race about Pirelli tyres, and, yes, he has something to say, and I would be the first to back him up if I had enough information around me to make a well-enough-informed decision on what happened to his tyre, or Nico Rosberg's failure on Friday.

But I don't have the facts, and neither did Sebastian when he verbally abused a very necessary supplier to Formula 1.

One thing he did say that I believe was rubbish was that neither he nor Rosberg went off the track prior to their tyre failures.

I suggest he has a look at the replays, and if he still sticks by what he said after the race I will personally get him an appointment at an optician.

When we go to Monza, we could very easily have the same problem. Personally, I doubt if any driver will ever stay between the white lines on the exit of the Ascari chicane.

Will that be deemed legal or illegal?

And if someone picks up a cut tyre while running out there in the marbles because it is faster, will they blame Pirelli too? Of course they will. Drivers are basically spoiled little kids and on the first page of the excuse book is 'find someone else to blame', never take the rap yourself.


Full article here - http://plus.autosport.com/premium/featu ... 1423160073

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 5:11 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:05 am
Posts: 2841
Location: Louisville, KY
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 275 times
That is a beautiful quote.


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 403 posts ]  Go to page Previous 117 18 19 20 21 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited