TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Wed May 15, 2024 2:20 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 609 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 531 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 11:59 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8767
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 617 times
Been thanked: 836 times
Wait, what? The modification had nothing to do with safety, they wanted more laps for the spectators and bigger grandstands.

Rainy days can be red flagged.

Safety on the dry was GREAT for a track that fast. Nothing to hit hard at the chicanes really, just sliding along barriers (cf. Alesi in 2000 and Herbert in 1999 when he lost his rear wing full speed before chicane 1). high-speed collisions were rare because in those times, drivers knew when to back off from stupidity when they feared for their lives.

Environment-wise, the new loop just destroyed more forest, when keeping the old layout would have been a status quo in terms of trees.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 12:23 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:45 pm
Posts: 2821
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 42 times
Question:
Is it forbidden in F1 to build a diesel engine? Im asking since they have to save fuel from start. If they had diesel engines they would probably go full power all distance and still have enough of fuel onboard. I dont know, im just asking. So dont throw rocks at me immediatley!


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 4:00 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 3155
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 335 times
gkmotorsport wrote:
Gaara wrote:
stimaro wrote:
Image

:cry:


I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did, tbh. The loop outside the stadium is ridiculously narrow compared to more modern tracks, and they'd need to fell hundreds of trees to widen it. The same trees held moisture in the air, so no-one could see when it rained, and there would be no telling how far into the forest a modern F1 car would end up if it got airborne.

It's a shame, because it was a unique circuit, but any modifications to the circuit that kept the basic layout would have destroyed the character anyway.



I always thought that they should have run down to the first chicane at least. They could have made the switch back quite interesting, with sweeping bends. Would have had to have cut down alot of trees, not sure on EU law, but couldn't they have on sold that fro a profit?


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 5:35 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:45 pm
Posts: 2821
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 42 times
Ok, thx for answer


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:03 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:31 pm
Posts: 200
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 9 times
Scotty wrote:
I'm sick of this bitching about old Hockenheim. It produced very few good races in its life time. Who cares about how fast it was the racing sucked. Only race people can recall is 2000, only memorable for changeable weather and a nutter on the track

Agreed, DRS era the old track would have had great potential. But so has Monza the racing hasn't changed there.


You talk about this like the new Hockenheim is some kind of bastion of great grand prix racing, which it is not. I enjoyed each and every race I have watched from there, and several notable things occurred there as well. Ex: Forget the year when Hakkinen blew a tire at the end of the last straight, 1999 start crash, 2000 raining off and on, 2001 huge start crash as well as Shumacher's Ferrari blowing up, which I remember as being unheard of at the time (I started watching GP racing after Ferrari sorted their reliability), although I will agree the spectacle came from pure speed. It was also fun to see the drivers driving the cars with very little downforce (Monza and Spa are downforce tracks now). The track at least had that unique thing going for it. Now it's similar without character IMO.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:10 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15471
Has thanked: 863 times
Been thanked: 639 times
James Hunt made a comment back in 1992 that the old Hockenheim wasn't a test of driver skill - it was just a car track. I agree.

It was a unique layout, but it was a nothing for the driver. The new track is better for drivers.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:23 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:31 pm
Posts: 200
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 9 times
mclaren2008 wrote:
James Hunt made a comment back in 1992 that the old Hockenheim wasn't a test of driver skill - it was just a car track. I agree.

It was a unique layout, but it was a nothing for the driver. The new track is better for drivers.


Have you looked at a list of the drivers who won there? All of them were either world champions or at least came close at some point. Also, in 1994 the Ferrari was not the best car, in 1997 the Benetton was not the best car, in 2001 and 2003 the Williams was not the best car (at least taking into account overall performances from those years) and I'm sure there are other examples going back further. In a way, isn't that like saying an oval is not "better for drivers"? Anyways, I just wish we didn't find ways to suck some character out of things like Formula One. The whole idea of auto racing is superflouous! To give it some other purpose than entertaining is flawed logic IMO. I Still remember when Kimi blew that tire towards the end in 2003?


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:33 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15471
Has thanked: 863 times
Been thanked: 639 times
I agree about the character thing, the old layout was a throwback to years past, it was something different. Yes it was an easy track to drive, but it was a test for engines. Not to mention it was one of the few tracks where slipstreaming was effective.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:55 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:38 pm
Posts: 13825
Has thanked: 193 times
Been thanked: 722 times
FP1 starting
Image


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:01 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:38 pm
Posts: 13825
Has thanked: 193 times
Been thanked: 722 times
Image
Susie Wolf has problems, D'oh


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:03 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15471
Has thanked: 863 times
Been thanked: 639 times
Susie already :(


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:03 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:45 pm
Posts: 2821
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 42 times
Here we go again for Williams. Repeat of Silverstone. Now Massa needs to smash it any moment


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:09 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15471
Has thanked: 863 times
Been thanked: 639 times
So much for that extra set of tyres promoting more track action - not a single car out there


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:19 am 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:04 am
Posts: 1793
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 11 times
Wolff back out, apparently it was only a sensor issue.

_________________
#29
Pittsburgh Steelers
Image


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:50 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15471
Has thanked: 863 times
Been thanked: 639 times
lot of cars going off - more than normal


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:58 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:45 pm
Posts: 2821
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 42 times
mclaren2008 wrote:
lot of cars going off - more than normal


They are practicing for sunday rain..


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 10:08 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:48 pm
Posts: 10354
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 280 times
I was watching some races from the old circuit thinking about how narrow it was, and how awesome that is! It gives a sense of speed, and side by side battles were always close. And it's different from all the identical boring wide circuits we have now. Why does every single new track have to be so wide?


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 10:11 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15471
Has thanked: 863 times
Been thanked: 639 times
It is supposed to "encourage" overtaking :flag:


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 10:54 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5806
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2773 times
Been thanked: 474 times
alex1369 wrote:
mclaren2008 wrote:
lot of cars going off - more than normal


They are practicing for sunday rain..


Martin Brundle said on Twitter that it was an inevitable result of the teams all removing their FRIC suspension.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 12:55 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:38 pm
Posts: 13825
Has thanked: 193 times
Been thanked: 722 times
FP2 about to start
Image


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 609 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 531 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: EsbenT and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited