TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 2:18 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6683 posts ]  Go to page Previous 193 94 95 96 97335 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:33 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
RtN wrote:
I wasn't aware that Red Bull were paying for ECUs that 'mostly' worked, or ECUs that randomly decided to desync from the pitwall.


Let's be honest. For most of the 21st century McLaren has made things that 'mostly' worked...

_________________
Dan Wheldon | 1978 - 2011


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:33 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8766
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 617 times
Been thanked: 836 times
Are the teams protesting that such a key component is made by one competitor for the whole grid?

And what control systems does the FIA have to ensure equity? Random pick out in front of official witnesses?


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:39 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
RtN wrote:
I wasn't aware that Red Bull were paying for ECUs that 'mostly' worked, or ECUs that randomly decided to desync from the pitwall.


Well perhaps Red Bull should perhaps look inside the box as it is not the first time athey have issues with a third party developed component that's used without issue by other teams on the grid... I vaguely remember that last year they kept on having alternator issues but blamed the manufacturer and Renault.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Last edited by kals on Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:41 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16093
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 936 times
or maybe McLaren rigged the ECU on purpose, or Red Bull failed to modify the stuff and that happened

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:42 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
coldtyre wrote:
Are the teams protesting that such a key component is made by one competitor for the whole grid?

And what control systems does the FIA have to ensure equity? Random pick out in front of official witnesses?


This component is not developed and distributed by the McLaren race team but instead by McLaren Electronic Systems, which is a wholly separate company. The FIA managed the tender process as well as everything else to do with the FIA mandated ECU. ;)

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:45 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
And if they did want to balls up another driver, they'd go for the other Red Bull :p

_________________
Dan Wheldon | 1978 - 2011


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:46 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
phil1993 wrote:
And if they did want to balls up another driver, they'd go for the other Red Bull :p


Not if Sam Michael was in charge.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:48 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
kals wrote:
phil1993 wrote:
And if they did want to balls up another driver, they'd go for the other Red Bull :p


Not if Sam Michael was in charge.


Has he been promoted from Kettle duties yet?

_________________
Dan Wheldon | 1978 - 2011


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:48 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16093
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 936 times
kals wrote:
This component is not developed and distributed by the McLaren race team but instead by McLaren Electronic Systems, which is a wholly separate company. The FIA managed the tender process as well as everything else to do with the FIA mandated ECU. ;)


shall we trust wikipedia?

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:49 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24626
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 707 times
kals wrote:
RtN wrote:
I wasn't aware that Red Bull were paying for ECUs that 'mostly' worked, or ECUs that randomly decided to desync from the pitwall.


Well perhaps Red Bull should perhaps look inside the box as it is not the first time athey have issues with a third party developed component that's used without issue by other teams on the grid... I vaguely remember that last year they kept on having alternator issues but blamed the manufacturer and Renault.


If it was a mistake or a failure on Red Bull's part, I would agree.

However, this incident is McLaren's fault. As were the multiple failures during testing which meant that some teams couldn't do all the long-run running they wanted to.

As far as the alternators are concerned, Renault accepted responsibility for that as well.

_________________
Dan Wheldon ¦ 1978-2011
Marco Simoncelli ¦ 1987-2011
Jules Bianchi ¦ 1989-2015
Justin Wilson ¦ 1978-2015

Yeah, I know he's mad and I don't care. I do not care. I did not care then. I do not care now. I'm here to race him.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:52 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
Alternator problems also affected Lotus (although not as much), ditto the KERS issue. Pic had a KERS issue last weekend.

What with the Power Units next year, reliability will be fun. You won't simply be able to continue with an ERS failure...

_________________
Dan Wheldon | 1978 - 2011


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:06 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
RtN wrote:
kals wrote:
RtN wrote:
I wasn't aware that Red Bull were paying for ECUs that 'mostly' worked, or ECUs that randomly decided to desync from the pitwall.


Well perhaps Red Bull should perhaps look inside the box as it is not the first time athey have issues with a third party developed component that's used without issue by other teams on the grid... I vaguely remember that last year they kept on having alternator issues but blamed the manufacturer and Renault.


If it was a mistake or a failure on Red Bull's part, I would agree.

However, this incident is McLaren's fault. As were the multiple failures during testing which meant that some teams couldn't do all the long-run running they wanted to.

As far as the alternators are concerned, Renault accepted responsibility for that as well.


I was trying (and failing) to be humorous by pointing out the links with Red Bull's very aggressive push on reliability. :thumbsup: I know this is a McLaren (ES)-wide issue.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:10 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24626
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 707 times
Ah.

_________________
Dan Wheldon ¦ 1978-2011
Marco Simoncelli ¦ 1987-2011
Jules Bianchi ¦ 1989-2015
Justin Wilson ¦ 1978-2015

Yeah, I know he's mad and I don't care. I do not care. I did not care then. I do not care now. I'm here to race him.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:32 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
LucasWheldon wrote:
kals wrote:
This component is not developed and distributed by the McLaren race team but instead by McLaren Electronic Systems, which is a wholly separate company. The FIA managed the tender process as well as everything else to do with the FIA mandated ECU. ;)


shall we trust wikipedia?


Whats your point?

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:14 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16093
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 936 times
nevermind, just misread the whole thing

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:56 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 3149
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 335 times
Didn"t McLaren get the ECU contract because Microsoft as a thrid party to McLaren were invloved?


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:59 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 3149
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 335 times
kals wrote:
Bleu wrote:
What sponsors they got late?
Image

Basically two biggest sponsor places almost empty: sides of the rollbar (only small Acer and Dark Dog) and sidepod


Autosport.com wrote:
On February 14, 2001, the cash-strapped Prost team suddenly looked like the team to beat ahead of the F1 season.

Jean Alesi, having already topped two of the previous four days of testing at Estoril, lapped the Portuguese circuit over a second quicker than anybody else had managed - or would manage - during the winter.

The rumours of the AP04 running massively underweight in a bid to grab instant headlines and convince potential sponsors to part with their cash, flew instantly - especially as the car had also gone second fastest at Barcelona two weeks previously. The rumours were right too. Sponsors secured, the car showed its true colours, scoring only four points all year.


A picture from that Estoril test...

Image


They did the same in 1999 as well don't forget.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:24 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8226
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 564 times
webbsy wrote:
Didn"t McLaren get the ECU contract because Microsoft as a thrid party to McLaren were invloved?



Yeah I remember Microsoft being involved as well..

Webber probably had an upside down BSOD then :lol:


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:14 pm 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:42 am
Posts: 1423
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 65 times
Random fact I didn't know: Drivers don't get any more penalties for speeding in the pits, but they have to pay 1000$ for each point they gain. So maybe if we see someone in the 10th place, he will drop back because he can't pay for the point. :p


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:16 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 15445
Has thanked: 408 times
Been thanked: 1658 times
That is a fact that I only found out about earlier today. The loss of the penalties is part of an agreement with the new higher costs for a super license.

However there is confusion among the drivers, who still received pit lane speeding penalties in Australia.

_________________
BTCC Pick Em's Champion 2010
Formula Fun Cup Champion 2013
http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6683 posts ]  Go to page Previous 193 94 95 96 97335 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited