The discussion ends HERE [Ferraripicture] [/img]

Sent from my SM-G781U1 using Tapatalk

I always wonder if it's just our nostalgia, because we were kids at the time. This would explain that late 90s or sometimes early 2ks gets mentioned, and that would correspond to today's young adults' childhood.

Can an old fart come here and confirm that mid-1990s is superior, even if they grew up in a previous era?

It's definitely nostalgia. There are plenty of people who argue that the V8s were the best-sounding engines, so it's always a moving target.

Anyway, here's my contribution for best-looking - the racing was crap, but every car looked different and colourful:

It's definitely nostalgia. There are plenty of people who argue that the V8s were the best-sounding engines, so it's always a moving target.

Anyway, here's my contribution for best-looking - the racing was crap, but every car looked different and colourful:

For me the looks of the cars are more than the liveries, the shape and style of them are important too. The skinny 1998 cars and particularly the ugly grooved tyres are a big detriment to the looks of the cars, annoyingly they'd just got a good thing going with the 1997 grid and then they ruined it

Late 60's pre-wing era IMO. Not having wings really emphasises the bullet-with-wheels look, and I love the exposed engine and pipes. The resulting sideways and minor air action in the turns and over the crests just elevates it to insane.

I like that pic, half a second before disaster. You wouldn't expect a thing if you don't know the story


Exactly! The minimum required to strap a person to an engine and 4 wheels and go race.

Do people really need more evidence that Schumacher was a dirty, cheating bastard?