TBK-Light.com :: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)

Can we change the answer to the poll to "Yes and Mercedes have built another shitty car" ?

anyone else thought Kimi got a preferential treatment by the FIA yesterday? Clearly some other drivers would have been penalised if they were released in the path of another car.

Tobias wrote:

anyone else thought Kimi got a preferential treatment by the FIA yesterday? Clearly some other drivers would have been penalised if they were released in the path of another car.

They were mentioning on Sky that it was considered acceptable this weekend because the pit lane was wider, and there was effectively two lanes that could be used.

StefMeister wrote:

Button saying the data shows that without the problem on his last stop they would have caught Rosberg with 2 laps to go.

On Rosberg's adjusted pace (because he clearly backed off knowing he had a 20 second lead after the stops) or on Rosberg's assumed pace he would of had if Button was still competitive? What a stupid thing to say.

Here is one for the nerds

How many leaders did we have yesterday, which race in F1 has had the most drivers lead a lap? Because I recall looking at the timing and Massa was actually leading at one stage.

LOL. The faces at the first minute are epic

Author:	highgroove [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:48 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Math "Champion shit Maker"

Author:	BrainPain [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:16 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Mäth wrote: Vettel is not impressed http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6100/jojvettel2.jpg Never do that again.

Author:	silverstone [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:34 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Fabs wrote: Can we change the answer to the poll to "Yes and Mercedes have built another shitty car" ? quoting dis

Author:	Ospi [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
we would be quoting all day if we pulled out the Merc/Rosberg/MSC can't win a race or get a podium comments.

Author:	Tobias [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
anyone else thought Kimi got a preferential treatment by the FIA yesterday? Clearly some other drivers would have been penalised if they were released in the path of another car.

TBK-Light.com https://www.tbk-light.com/phpBB3/

2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15) https://www.tbk-light.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=7450	Page 50 of 51

Author:	Omega [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:10 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Tobias wrote: anyone else thought Kimi got a preferential treatment by the FIA yesterday? Clearly some other drivers would have been penalised if they were released in the path of another car. ow please

Author:	Tobias [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
well, it's just that I was sure he was going to be penalised for it, but then proved to be wrong.

Author:	Fergo [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Tobias wrote: anyone else thought Kimi got a preferential treatment by the FIA yesterday? Clearly some other drivers would have been penalised if they were released in the path of another car. They were mentioning on Sky that it was considered acceptable this weekend because the pit lane was wider, and there was effectively two lanes that could be used.

Author:	ellis [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Fergie wrote: Tobias wrote: anyone else thought Kimi got a preferential treatment by the FIA yesterday? Clearly some other drivers would have been penalised if they were released in the path of another car. They were mentioning on Sky that it was considered acceptable this weekend because the pit lane was wider, and there was effectively two lanes that could be used. to add to this, they have tracks where it's allowed and where it isn't allowed. The teams have always been moved slightly closer to the garages, to maximise the driving lanes. This rule was introduced because it meant whoever was pitting second in the pit lane always lost out. If you pitted at the same time as a car behind, then you could never beat them out without being released "unsafely". It was always too close to do so, so whoever pits second would always either get a penalty or lose a spot. Now it's more fair.

Author:	Beezle [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:09 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Scotty wrote: StefMeister wrote: Button saying the data shows that without the problem on his last stop they would have caught Rosberg with 2 laps to go. On Rosberg's adjusted pace (because he clearly backed off knowing he had a 20 second lead after the stops) or on Rosberg's assumed pace he would of had if Button was still competitive? What a stupid thing to say. Everyone who does this "what if" thing with Buttons pit stop has to do it with Schumachers pit stop too. What if both were good stops and Schumacher blocked him some laps? The winner would most likely still be Rosberg.

Author:	alex1369 [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
So anyone knows how manny overtakings were made during the race?

Author:	phil1993 [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:09 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Scotty wrote: Here is one for the nerds How many leaders did we have yesterday, which race in F1 has had the most drivers lead a lap? Because I recall looking at the timing and Massa was actually leading at one stage. To add to what Math said, eight different drivers held P2 at some point in the race. The closeness of this season means Monaco should be amazing.

Author:	Barre [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Just watched the BBC broadcast as i was working on sunday and that was a great race like i was expecting cause i usually really like the Chinese grand prix. Also the first full race i saw with Ben Edwards as commentator and he owns.

Author:	matthew [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
I agree... I think I liked BBCs coverage better than SkyF1's.

Author:	codename_47 [ Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Are the Meme creators of the world just editing out Petrov's flying Renault from Malaysia last year and pasting in Webber's Red Bull? It might be chidlish but there's something in the deep recesses of my brain that thinks an F1 car popping a wheelie is hella cool!

Page 50 of 51	All times are UTC+01:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	EAS [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:36 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
That's because this isn't Webber in Le Mans

Author:	EAS [ Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:13 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
And another version for the flight of Webber

Author:	Philthy82 [ Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:54 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
Especially when it goes on to beat its teammate

Author:	pereiraschumy [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:01 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
LOL. The faces at the first minute are epic

Author:	Juihi [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:57 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 2012 UBS Chinese Grand Prix (April 13-15)
pereiraschumy wrote: LOL. The faces at the first minute are epic That's epic don't sit drivers on chairs that can go up and down especially if sat next to eachother is the main lession!