It looks like an unloved child of Valencia.

You mean the bastard love child of Valencia and Korea...

What do you guys expect when you have to build a track around an Olympic Park and have to cope with FIA restrictions!?

Wow he really ran out of ideas like 7 years ago.

You do have to wonder about their mentality sometimes.

It was supposed to be about tracks the drivers hate, name one driver that hates Cleveland.

Their main argument was that it was a poor man's Oscherrich ring

Modern Spa, Silverstone and Monza are not a shade on the originals either. But if anyone says they are the worst then they're fucking idiots.

I know it's an opinion piece really, and I'm banging the same drum yet again - but Autosport is full of shit. They just talk complete and utter BOLLOCKS, claim everything as an exclusive, even if it's months old, and report every rumour as true, so that when they can get one right they can claim off it for years.

Autosport is crap. It really is.

Not strictly just F1 but I didn't know where else to put it....

Autosport put A1 Ring in their "worlds worst racetracks" feature...

Makes me even wonder if they "get" motorsport at all.

Their main argument was that it was a poor man's Oscherrich ring, which is technically true but then holding that against the track when itself is very decent, racing wise, and as far as I can tell didn't put on a boring F1 race for the 7 years it hosted the race there.

Compared to some of the other shit to come along in the past few years it's the fricking motorracing mecca....

Maybe I have different motivations on what makes a great track to those at Autosport.
I'm just a fan, I rate a track based on the quality of racing there, not hoping that if I write a nice article about Porsche they might loan me a Carrera Cup for an afternoon and I'll actually get to drive it.
I imagine the A1 Ring isn't great to drive (and that it's easy to miss a braking point on the various gradients and ruin your lap so add frustrating on to that) but I don't know why they don't realise that the racing there is usually excellent.

I guess with tracks like the A1 Ring and Hockenheim etc, it would help the tracks reputation if they weren't racing around the graveyard of a much better legendary track, and I can see that to an extent, but you have to move past that eventually and judge what we have now on its own merits.

And then, just when I thought I was mad enough, in their "tracks that almost made the list..." section they said they tried to put Cleveland on there, but their driver expert Danny Sullivan wasn't having any of it (thank god)
My copy nearly went out the window right there and then!

I used to buy it religiously every week. I have at my parents home about 8 years worth of magazines starting in 1996, hardly ever missing an issue. And I was paying Australian imported costs. In the end I was paying about $11 an issue. I don't want to think about the money I spent on them. Then when I lived in Japan I did the same for a couple of years and had to throw those ones away....But if you go back through the issues over time you can actually see the content get worse and worse and have less substance. For me when Nigel Roebuck left, the magazine lost its luster. From Adam Cooper's writing I feel he is only concerned with his own self importance. And this is how pedantic I am. In 1999 they started changing the layout of the magazine and it became more tabloid like, and in my opinion, which I stressed at the time, a much more inferior magazine. There was less content and more slick layouts.

Nowdays I down load it sporadically..and pretty much delete it straight away. They are no longer worth keeping like they used to be which is a shame, cause I do enjoy going back over past issues and reading through the race reports...and seeing just how woefully wrong they were with most of their predictions.