Magnifico wrote:
I really don't understand the voting.
Mark Webber was dominant and had pace in reserve.
Robert Kubica got a BMW on merit onto the podium in the dry and did so from 8th on the grid. Harrying Webber as long as he could and beating a Brawn on merit.
Sebastien Buemi scored Toro Rosso's first point in the dry and never once lost his head.
Raikkonen after nearly getting KO'ed by Webber. Drove around with fuel in his eye and recovered for 6th.
Let alone the recoveries of Hamilton, Vettel and Button.
Kamui Kobayashi's debut was entertaining and spirited but it certainly wasn't the drive of the day. That honour I'll give to Kubica just ahead of Webber.
Webber had clearly the best car and used of unfair manoeuvres once again. Victory was the minimum expected since his team mate started 15th.
Kubica had good pace but we already knew he is good AND BMW IS NOT BAD ANYMORE, the car had big improvements which they couldn't benefit in Suzuka because the wet friday unabled to setup properly a new car and despite that Heidfeld would be 4th without pit mistake(not to mention the wrong gear ratio BMW had)
Buemi didn't impress at all, benefited from wet qualifying and the improvement of Toro Rosso, also was a non-entity in front of Button. He almost parked the car to let Button pass.
Hamilton's result was only due to strategy, nothing exceptional from his driving.
Vettel have the best car and many that started ahead had problems throught the race.
Button did some brave overtakings but only Kobayashi was a real opponent. Grosjean was pathetic and Nakajima useless.
Your arguments are inconsistent imo.
This is the way I see it:
Peter wrote:
My vote goes to Kobayashi. He's the only one and as a rookie that stepped in F1 in a new car this year and immediately be on pace. He should be on the grid for more races.
Register
Login
FAQ
Search
.
