TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:37 am

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 224 posts ]  Go to page Previous 18 9 10 11 12 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:01 am 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:27 pm
Posts: 1863
Location: Sneek, Fryslân, Netherlands, Europe, Earth
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 94 times
It is utterly sad that it is coming to this. Especially the FIA, but also FOTA should be ashamed if F1 breaks apart.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:00 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:49 pm
Posts: 4592
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 37 times
Ferrari & co are just scared that they can't win based on how good they are, they want to win based on who has the most money


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:16 pm 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:04 am
Posts: 1665
Location: Jenson Button is running in the top 10 in 11th place.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times
Cant say id be overly upset with a break away series. Just means more motorsport to watch. :?


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:28 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24622
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 706 times
FOTA back down from leadership change demands, want negotiation on budget cap.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/76263

Advantage Max?


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:42 pm 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:27 pm
Posts: 1863
Location: Sneek, Fryslân, Netherlands, Europe, Earth
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 94 times
So now we have to wait until July 1st, possibly. Better than a split IMO.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:03 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:22 pm
Posts: 374
Location: .IN ....... http://www.f1zone.net
RtN wrote:
FOTA back down from leadership change demands, want negotiation on budget cap.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/76263

Advantage Max?


But still 'NO' to FIA's budget cap and want get ahead with FOTA's cost cutting measures with FIA policing it.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:27 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24622
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 706 times
It is the step down Mosely was looking for, though, and I would not be surprised to see this end in a compromise of some description.

This whole thing over the past 2 weeks has been especially annoying because they were so close to a deal after Monaco. Mosely had accepted some of FOTA's basic principles (no two-tier system, a graduated cap over several years), whilst they had accepted the need for a cap that would eventually reach £40 million. And the two sides spat their dummies out after that for no real reason.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:58 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
Max's response:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/76266

Quote:
FIA president Max Mosley says there will be no backing down on his insistence that Formula 1 teams lift the conditions attached to their entries within 48 hours, but has hinted that a compromise could now be on the cards.

Following a letter from the Formula One Teams' Association to Mosley and Bernie Ecclestone, viewed as a last ditch effort to avert teams walking away from the sport, the FIA laid out the terms by which it would accept a deal.

Although rejecting suggestions that the deadline for the matter be delayed from this Friday to July 1, and that standard engine supplier Cosworth be forced to detune its engines, the FIA says it would be willing to talk about governance changes and revisions to the cost cap.

In the letter, a copy of which has been seen by AUTOSPORT, Mosley said there was no chance of a revised Concorde Agreement being sorted before Friday - so the 1998 version would have to be used as an interim.

"If we start to modify the governance provisions of the 1998 Concorde Agreement, a lengthy discussion will begin," he wrote. "There is no time left for this because we must answer the remaining applicants for 2010 no later than Friday."

He added: "Our proposal is therefore that all parties agree to accept the 1998 governance provisions by means of an exchange of letters. We can then negotiate a new 2009 Concorde Agreement under the protection of the 1998 arrangement.

"After all, we lived with these for ten years; a few more weeks or months should not cause any difficulty."

Regarding FOTA’s suggestions that independent accountants be appointed to oversee compliance with a budget cap, Mosley said that such an idea had already been suggested by the governing body.

Furthermore, he wants the teams to accept the £40 million limit for now, prior to further discussions that could see it changed in the next few weeks.

"A fundamental problem with the FOTA proposal was the absence of a clear figure," wrote Mosley. "The teams need to know what the constraints are, so do we.

"We therefore propose that you accept the 2010 rules, as published, which we agreed with you last year. If necessary, these can be revised with the above governance procedures in due course."

Mosley confirmed that there would be no two-tier regulations in 2010, which had been one of the biggest complaints of FOTA.

However, he said that Cosworth would be allowed to run to 2006 regulations because it had "neither the time nor the resources to return for 2010."

And in a bid to get the matter sorted in the next day or so, Mosley said he would write to the teams to ask them to accept the FIA’s offer so they could drop the conditions attached to their entries before Friday's deadline.

"We will shortly send a letter for signature to each team. If signed and returned, the letter will make the above proposals legally binding and the relevant team's entry unconditional," he said.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:31 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:21 am
Posts: 9244
Location: Chile
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 275 times
StefMeister wrote:
Max's response:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/76266

Quote:
Furthermore, he wants the teams to accept the £40 million limit for now, prior to further discussions that could see it changed in the next few weeks.


It's a trap!


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:56 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
FIA have released more documents detailing there meetings with FOTA, including minutes from some of the meetings:
http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pr ... _fota.aspx


Quote:
On 11 January 2008, the FIA, FOM and the teams met in Paris. During the meeting
FIA President Max Mosley identified the ‘possibility of a worldwide recession which
would have an effect on the motoring industry’.

Several of the teams present suggested that the fairest and most effective way of
minimising the impact of the recession would be through the introduction of a
budget cap. John Howett (Toyota), Ross Brawn (representing Honda), Frank
Williams (Williams), Burkhard Göschel (BMW), Martin Whitmarsh (McLaren), Vijay
Mallya (Force India), Christian Horner (Red Bull) and Bernie Ecclestone (FOM) all
spoke favourably about the proposal for a cost cap and encouraged further
discussion on the subject.

Only Jean Todt (Ferrari) disagreed, stating that a cost cap was not achievable for
his team.

The minutes of the meeting concluded:
‘After further discussion, Max Mosley proposed that Tony Purnell
convene a meeting of the teams’ Finance Directors as soon as possible
to discuss on a figure or figures for costs excluding engine, marketing
and drivers for 2009, 2010 and 2011. This was UNANIMOUSLY
AGREED. It was also AGREED that Bernie Ecclestone and Max Mosley
would decide on a final figure. It was also AGREED that no press
statements were made about these plans as they would have severe
implications for employees and also might encourage sponsors to reduce
their sponsorship levels.

‘The next step would be to set up a Working Group to discuss the
measurement of how the money was spent. This would need to be in
place before 30 June 2008 because the rule would need to be introduced
as a sporting regulation for 2009. Otherwise other rules would need to be
in place for 2009 to cap teams’ budgets.’

The first meeting took place on 31 January 2008 and involved representatives from
every F1 team on the grid.

There were four meetings of the Financial Working Group between March and June
2008. All the current F1 teams except Ferrari enthusiastically endorsed the principle
of the cap. They worked hard on the detail. Minutes of these meetings can be made
available. In the circumstances, the FOTA claim that the cost cap rules were
introduced by the FIA without consultation cannot be sustained.


The Working Group developed a set of regulations that were ready by mid-June
2008. At least eight of the 2008 competitors supported the proposals. However,
Ferrari again objected and effectively prevented them from going forward.

In late 2008, galvanised by the departure of Honda from F1, FOTA began its own
process of looking at measures to reduce costs. Much of these were a reaction to
the FIA’s initiative. By March 2009, however, it was clear that the FOTA measures
were not going to produce the results needed. It had become essential to reduce
costs to the point where independent teams could survive, new teams could afford
to enter and manufacturer teams were less likely to leave. The FIA had to act and
do so in time to allow new teams to enter in 2010. This meant introducing rules to
reduce, definitively, the costs of competing in Formula One from 2010 onwards.
In the light of the active and enthusiastic participation of all teams except Ferrari in
drafting the original cost cap rules, it is difficult to understand the objections to the
cost cap which are now being raised.


In the Minutes the FIA seem to like the word AGREED since every time its mentioned they make it big & bold :lol:


Also having read the Minutes it seems the idea of a Budget-Cap may have originated from Ross Brawn:
Quote:
Ross Brawn felt that the FIA and the teams’ albeit worthy attempts in the past to
drastically cut costs had failed due to the fact that although technical constraints had
been introduced to reduce expenditure, the teams had continued to spend in other
ways. He therefore felt that it might be preferable to consider budget caps in some if
not all areas of car development along with technical constraints as he felt that this
was the only way to really control actual spend.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:12 pm 
Offline
Power-Hungry Shithead Mod
Power-Hungry Shithead Mod
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:19 pm
Posts: 12750
Location: Social distancing in Atlanta
Has thanked: 187 times
Been thanked: 414 times
Joni, please refrain from posting any more of the "Pilotoons", please.

I know I'm a little late, but if a split goes on, with all the teams, it would be more like USAC/CART instead of CART/IRL. Back in 1978, many teams contesting the USAC Championship Trail were unhappy with various things going on with the sanctioning body, such as purses, promotion, and the like. CART was then formed, or was supposed to be formed, as an advocacy group for these teams, much like FOTA is these days for F1 teams. The Gurney White Paper specifically details the various demands that this CART organization had for USAC. USAC rejected the demands, and CART split and ran their own series, much like what might or might not happen with F1. All the teams of CART, save for the Foyt team, who initially supported the CART movement but then backed down and supported USAC, broke away and ran their own series, which was sanctioned by the SCCA (Sports Car Club of America) to receive accreditation from ACCUS, which is the FIA's American affiliate. I could be way off, but that's how I see it.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:24 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24622
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 706 times
Mosely responds to FOTA's offer.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/76269

Looking good.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:30 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15439
Has thanked: 861 times
Been thanked: 639 times
At least they are finding a solution.

footballs wrote:
Cant say id be overly upset with a break away series. Just means more motorsport to watch. :?


Australia wouldn't get to see a second of the breakaway series.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:04 am
Posts: 1665
Location: Jenson Button is running in the top 10 in 11th place.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times
mclaren2008 wrote:
At least they are finding a solution.

footballs wrote:
Cant say id be overly upset with a break away series. Just means more motorsport to watch. :?


Australia wouldn't get to see a second of the breakaway series.

And how do you know this?


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:46 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
mclaren2008 wrote:
At least they are finding a solution.

footballs wrote:
Cant say id be overly upset with a break away series. Just means more motorsport to watch. :?


Australia wouldn't get to see a second of the breakaway series.


I'm sure many teams would like to go to Adelaide and Melbourne...


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:48 pm 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:04 am
Posts: 1665
Location: Jenson Button is running in the top 10 in 11th place.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times
Even if this breakaway did happen, i dont reckon they would go to adelaide or melbourne. It would be one of the permanent circuits. Which only leaves Phillip Island really. But now im getting off topic as A) we dont even know this split will happen and B) Its all speculation.


Top
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:46 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
footballs wrote:
Even if this breakaway did happen, i dont reckon they would go to adelaide or melbourne. It would be one of the permanent circuits. Which only leaves Phillip Island really. But now im getting off topic as A) we dont even know this split will happen and B) Its all speculation.


C) They would have the best part of 8 months to prepare...not gonna happen


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:01 am 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24622
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 706 times
Oh shit.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/76292


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:02 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:13 pm
Posts: 2299
Location: 9036
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 81 times
Ooooohhhh dear:

Quote:
Teams to launch breakaway series

By jonathan noble Thursday, June 18th 2009, 22:43 GMT

The Formula One Teams' Association announced on Thursday night that it is setting up a breakaway championship.

Following a four hour meeting at Renault's Enstone factory, the eight members of FOTA said it had grown frustrated with the FIA's stance against it and that it had no option but to create its own championship.

"The teams cannot continue to compromise on the fundamental values of the sport and have declined to alter their original conditional entries to the 2010 World Championship," said a statement.

"These teams therefore have no alternative other than to commence the preparation for a new Championship which reflects the values of its participants and partners. This series will have transparent governance, one set of regulations, encourage more entrants and listen to the wishes of the fans, including offering lower prices for spectators worldwide, partners and other important stakeholders.

"The major drivers, stars, brands, sponsors, promoters and companies historically associated with the highest level of motorsport will all feature in this new series."

More to follow.


:o


Top
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:10 am 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:10 pm
Posts: 5885
Location: Colchester, England
Tonight could be the death of F1. And the top level of single-seater racing irrevocably damaged.


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 224 posts ]  Go to page Previous 18 9 10 11 12 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited