TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:53 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 224 posts ]  Go to page Previous 17 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:58 pm 
Offline
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:50 pm
Posts: 571
Location: On top of old smokey
Has thanked: 7 times
Quote:
FIA says £40m budget cap going ahead

By Jonathan Noble
Tuesday, June 16th 2009, 09:13 GMT

Max MosleyThe FIA says that its plans for a £40 million budget cap will now go ahead unchanged, after the latest talks between the governing body and the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) to try and find a compromise ended without a deal.

Leading financial representatives from both the FIA and FOTA met in London on Monday to try and reach a settlement on next year's rules that would be acceptable to both parties.

There had been some hope that new rules could be put in place after preliminary agreement was reached between FIA president Max Mosley and several representatives of FOTA in a meeting last week.

However, the FIA has been left disappointed that this week's meeting achieved nothing, after FOTA's representatives said they could not discuss the rules, and the teams' proposals were rejected as being ineffective.

A statement issued by the FIA on Tuesday said: "As agreed at the meeting of 11 June, FIA financial experts met yesterday with financial experts from FOTA.

"Unfortunately, the FOTA representatives announced that they had no mandate to discuss the FIA's 2010 financial regulations. Indeed, they were not prepared to discuss regulation at all.

"As a result, the meeting could not achieve its purpose of comparing the FIA's rules with the FOTA proposals with a view to finding a common position.

"In default of a proper dialogue, the FOTA financial proposals were discussed but it became clear that these would not be capable of limiting the expenditure of a team which had the resources to outspend its competitors. Another financial arms race would then be inevitable.

"The FIA Financial Regulations therefore remain as published."

The FIA has become increasingly frustrated with the failure to find a solution to the row, and on Monday it accused factions with FOTA of deliberately trying to scupper a deal.

F1's current teams have been given until Friday to drop the conditions attached to their entries, or risk being left off the grid for 2010.

With part of their conditions being that the 2010 regulations are scrapped, the FIA's latest stance makes it increasingly unlikely that the matter can be resolved before the deadline.


ugh I think this might be the end of F1 as we know it. One party has to make a 180 turn and they all look much to stuborn for that.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:13 pm 
Offline
Australian - All the animals look so strange
Australian - All the animals look so strange
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:38 pm
Posts: 528
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2 times
Dun dun dunnnn...

So by letter of the statements and the rules there are 4 teams with conditional entries that are now void with this cap decisions (BMW, McLaren-Mercedes, Toyota, and Brawn) and Ferrari said they won't be in 2010 if the cap is approved.

Who will back down? Seems the FIA won't. Can these teams hold out and risk being out of F1? I assume the 4 conditional entries will be changed (especially for McLaren-Mercedes who were offering the middle ground cap) by the 20th June. But Ferrari can't really move without losing face in this situation now.

Makes for an interesting week.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 3:49 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
FIA have released a Press release detailing some of there contact with FOTA:
http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pr ... _fota.aspx

Here are some of the intresting bits:
Quote:
Faced with the prospect of only 18 cars in Melbourne 2009 and the possibility of worse to come in 2010, the FIA had to act. There were two obvious steps. First, approach Mr. di Montezemolo to see if the car manufacturers would guarantee the presence of their teams in 2010 so that we would not have a repeat of the Honda situation. Secondly, begin talks with FOTA about reducing costs to the point where the manufacturers would be less likely to stop, the independent teams would be viable and perhaps some new teams would enter to fill the empty spaces.

Mr. di Montezemolo promised to secure the necessary guarantees from the main car manufacturing companies (not to be confused with guarantees from the teams). He continued to promise this all through the winter, most recently at a meeting he had with the FIA’s President on 23 February 2009. Not one such letter has been forthcoming – not even from Mr. di Montezemolo's own company FIAT.

At the same time FOTA and Mr. di Montezemolo rebuffed all attempts to hold meetings to discuss cost reduction. There was no need, the FIA were told. FOTA's own measures were adequate and they would make up for the shortage of cars by each running a third car. By March it was clear that FOTA had no intention of facilitating the entry of new teams, indeed were opposed.

Ferrari voted against the financial regulation at that meeting but not against special technical freedoms for the new teams (i.e. Ferrari did not vote against the "two-tier" system).

Even after this vote, FOTA were not prepared to talk. Neither was Mr. di Montezemolo, even privately. In the absence of any negotiation or any sign that the promised guarantees of participation from the car companies would be forthcoming, it was essential to publish detailed regulations and invite entries from new teams. Otherwise there was a real risk that there would not be enough cars for Melbourne in 2010.

The detailed regulations were discussed and voted on at the WMSC meeting of 29 April. The new Ferrari representative on the WMSC was Mr. di Montezemolo, replacing Jean Todt whose Ferrari contract finished on 31 March. Mr. di Montezemolo chose not to attend but gave a proxy to Mr. Macaluso, the Italian president of Karting, who also did not attend but joined the meeting by video link. His was one of two votes against the new rules but no reasons or alternative were offered.

John Howett as vice-chairman of FOTA led their delegation in the absence of Mr. di Montezemolo. As soon as the FIA raised the question of the financial regulation, Mr. Howett tried to lead a walk-out of the teams. This did not succeed but during the meeting it became known that Ferrari had begun emergency proceedings in the French courts seeking to prevent the introduction of the 2010 rules. It was clear that FOTA had no intention of negotiating anything but simply expected the FIA to agree to all its demands.

in particular the "two-tier" system. It was explained that it had already been agreed to substitute technical help from established teams for the two-tier system at the Heathrow meeting, so this was no longer an issue. This was pointed out to Mr di Montezemolo at least five times during the meeting but he and FOTA are still talking about it today.

On 29 May, the eight remaining FOTA teams submitted conditional entries. Among the conditions were a requirement that the FIA forthwith sign FOTA's new Concorde Agreement (which diluted the Sporting Code, made an outside body, the CAS, the ultimate appeal court, allowed any team to veto rule changes and removed the FIA's right to insist on changes if the cars became dangerously fast). FOTA also crossed out references to the International Sporting Code on their entry forms and wanted the 2010 Rules rescinded notwithstanding that a number of new teams had already submitted entries.

A further meeting was held on 11 June at which FOTA were represented by Ross Brawn (Brawn), Stefano Domenicali (Ferrari), Christian Horner (Red Bull) and John Howett (Toyota). After nearly five hours of talks, it was agreed that the FOTA and FIA cost-reduction objectives were very close if not identical and that the financial experts from both side should meet without delay to seek a common position on detail. Also, the FIA's proposal to extend the 1998 Concorde Agreement in order to avoid interminable negotiations was well received. Agreement was also reached on some minor modifications and clarifications to the 2010 rules.

No sooner had all this been agreed than FOTA put out a statement saying no progress had been made in the meeting. This blatant falsehood demonstrates once again that elements in FOTA simply do not want agreement.

FOTA says, "The new rules dumb down the sport". Not so, the 2009 regulations introduced greater technical freedom in several areas. The 2010 Regulations will allow even greater freedom. Compare this with the FOTA proposals: almost no testing, no KERS, homologated gearbox, homologated bodywork, limitations on factory activities, enforced shutdowns and so on.


http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/Do ... hp-pdc.pdf
http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/Do ... ldm-mm.pdf
http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/Do ... ncorde.pdf
http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/Do ... to-ldm.pdf


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:11 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:32 am
Posts: 2538
Location: Ser del Barca es el millor que hi ha!
New series is a win-win situation for everyone.

1. Teams-More revenues from commercial rights and what's more important, stable rules that aren't changed after every wet dream Mosley has.
2. Track owners- Wont have to pay ridiculous amount of hosting fee to Ecclestone and that would decrease the ticket prize=>even more tickets sold.
3. Fans- Without bullshit from Mosley and Bernie we are guaranteed to have less politics but more raceing.

I do think that the split cant be comparable to IRL/Champcar. 90% of serious teams would leave to create proper series.While, most probably only Williams will stick to F1.And who cares about Williams anyway?


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:20 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
Schumack wrote:
New series is a win-win situation for everyone.

1. Teams-More revenues from commercial rights and what's more important, stable rules that aren't changed after every wet dream Mosley has.
2. Track owners- Wont have to pay ridiculous amount of hosting fee to Ecclestone and that would decrease the ticket prize=>even more tickets sold.
3. Fans- Without bullshit from Mosley and Bernie we are guaranteed to have less politics but more raceing.

I do think that the split cant be comparable to IRL/Champcar. 90% of serious teams would leave to create proper series.While, most probably only Williams will stick to F1.And who cares about Williams anyway?


and we'd get good old tracks like Imola, Montreal, Silverstone, Magny Cours back


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:43 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8226
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 564 times
Schumack wrote:
New series is a win-win situation for everyone.

1. Teams-More revenues from commercial rights and what's more important, stable rules that aren't changed after every wet dream Mosley has.
2. Track owners- Wont have to pay ridiculous amount of hosting fee to Ecclestone and that would decrease the ticket prize=>even more tickets sold.
3. Fans- Without bullshit from Mosley and Bernie we are guaranteed to have less politics but more raceing.

I do think that the split cant be comparable to IRL/Champcar. 90% of serious teams would leave to create proper series.While, most probably only Williams will stick to F1.And who cares about Williams anyway?


And with the split we'll probably lose Renault and Toyota as both companies are probably very excited for having a reason to quit F1 without pissing off too many fans.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 4:45 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24623
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 707 times
Schumack wrote:
New series is a win-win situation for everyone.

1. Teams-More revenues from commercial rights and what's more important, stable rules that aren't changed after every wet dream Mosley has.
2. Track owners- Wont have to pay ridiculous amount of hosting fee to Ecclestone and that would decrease the ticket prize=>even more tickets sold.
3. Fans- Without bullshit from Mosley and Bernie we are guaranteed to have less politics but more raceing.

I do think that the split cant be comparable to IRL/Champcar. 90% of serious teams would leave to create proper series.While, most probably only Williams will stick to F1.And who cares about Williams anyway?


Really?

Any new series will last about 10 years at the maximum. FOTA may show unity now but when they're controlling their own revenues, it'll be a lot less friendly.

1) Stable rules aren't necessarily a good thing. Of course, the teams at the front of the grid will love them. What about the teams at the back, though? They'll want to change the rules, and they won't be able to. So they'll leave. Brawn will be first, as they won't have the budget to compete with the $200 million-a-year budgets of Ferrari and McLaren. Renault and Toyota will have finally pulled the plug anyway, so we're down to 5 teams at that point.

2) Tracks will make a profit to begin with. However, as the management structure of the series falls apart, fewer and fewer people will attend, and the tracks will again struggle to break even.

3) "Less politics". Hardly. In fact, with every decision having to go through a committee of the teams, there'll be even more politics. More tantrums from teams who don't get their way. More boycotts. More rhetoric.

As a matter of fact, the split can be compared to the CART\IRL split; it may be the other way around from 13 years ago, but you still have 90% of the teams on one side and one authority figure on the other. And what happened then? CART's management structure imploded 7 years after the split, and 4 years after that one of the new owners stabbed the other two in the back and sold out to the other side.

It's going to be a nice six months while everyone's on the same side, working together to make a viable alternative. And then the cracks appear. Arguments take place. Backroom alliances are forged. And before you know it, hey presto, the same circus under a different name.

Mosely is no saint, but the system he operates is a strong one. If FOTA's real ambition is to get rid of Max, then they should have done it the traditional way and between them fielded a candidate to run against him in October. Mosely has never had to face real opposition, and would likely get toppled.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:07 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
RtN wrote:
If FOTA's real ambition is to get rid of Max, then they should have done it the traditional way and between them fielded a candidate to run against him in October. Mosely has never had to face real opposition, and would likely get toppled.
Good point.

Lets not forget that Max got voted in as president of what was then FISA in 1991 with backing from teams based on Jean Marie baleste's unpopularity at the time.

Max is up for re-election in October, if FOTA were to support an opposition candidate who was popular within the FIA as well as amongst others involved in F1 its likely he would win an election against Max.



A Breakaway would never work, not in the long run. Sponsors & fans would be split so intrest from both of these would almost certainly decline over time. If you look at the CART/IRL split, initially both series were doing OK, CART was doing just as well as it had been Pre-Split. However as Sponsor's became split between the 2 series it became harder for either to find sponsor's that would stick around. Likewise with fans, they became split to the point where most lost intrest & the Die-Hard's of both series did nothing but fight which created an even bigger split.

I also more or less agree with RtN's 3 points.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:11 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:10 pm
Posts: 5885
Location: Colchester, England
Schumack wrote:
New series is a win-win situation for everyone.

1. Teams-More revenues from commercial rights and what's more important, stable rules that aren't changed after every wet dream Mosley has.
2. Track owners- Wont have to pay ridiculous amount of hosting fee to Ecclestone and that would decrease the ticket prize=>even more tickets sold.
3. Fans- Without bullshit from Mosley and Bernie we are guaranteed to have less politics but more raceing.

I do think that the split cant be comparable to IRL/Champcar. 90% of serious teams would leave to create proper series.While, most probably only Williams will stick to F1.And who cares about Williams anyway?


Are you kidding yourself? This will be an absolute re-run of the IRL/Champ Car collapse. F1 will kill itself if this goes through.

The other week we had threats over the Turkish GP, if this goes tits up on Friday, could we have a British GP pullout I wonder?


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 pm
Posts: 93343
Location: New ribs please...
Has thanked: 398 times
Been thanked: 1338 times
Wouldn't surprise me if things went tits up on Friday. The problem is the ego's on both sides, both sides are stubborn dicks and they'll destroy the sport before ever agreeing.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8226
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 564 times
Gaara wrote:
Wouldn't surprise me if things went tits up on Friday. The problem is the ego's on both sides, both sides are stubborn dicks and they'll destroy the sport before ever agreeing.



Like at Indy.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:22 pm
Posts: 93343
Location: New ribs please...
Has thanked: 398 times
Been thanked: 1338 times
Exactly.

Only this time it'll be a race with two teams instead of three.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:00 pm 
Offline
Official TBK Rain Predictor
Official TBK Rain Predictor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:18 pm
Posts: 15411
Location: Quite rainy Antwerp
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 492 times
Finally, F1 will die.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:06 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:03 pm
Posts: 3514
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 102 times
Fabs wrote:
Finally, F1 will die.

RIP :cry:


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24623
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 707 times
Fabs wrote:
Finally, F1 will die.


Don't count on it. Mosely has friends in very wealthy places, as well a drive to prove FOTA wrong- that F1 can survive without them.

Plus, if he's in the right over Ferrari, RBR and STR, and those three teams break their contractual obligations, Mosely will take them to the cleaners.


Top
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:58 am
Posts: 3381
Location: Bruges, Belgium, Joined Mon May 12, 2003 5:27 pm
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 77 times
a 40 million budget is rudiculous... Real Madrid last week paid a total of 150 million for two players...

I want to have more teams on the grid, but it seems those 'new' teams want to be in the same boat like the other teams by winning races and fighting for the championship. In the last 30 years I don't think, apart for Brawn and Wolf, there weren't many teams that could immediately fight for the win. There must be some, I don't know how to explain it, but it has to be a bit more like Jordan, a first year that was sometimes difficult, sometimes great, and then slowly getting better and better.

There should be some kind of hierarchy where you have the best teams, good teams, midfield teams, mediocre teams and moving chicanes. That's what is so great about the sport.

If in football each team would be winning to each other team, it wouldn't be fun anymore. If Barcelone looses a game against number 15 in the spanish competition, that's great because it is more 'rare', but if that would happen all the time, then where's the fun?

I usually chear for the smaller teams, because when they achieve something, it is just great, when Minardi managed to score points I always found it great.

oh well, we'll see where it ends, but I hope the FOTA teams will stick to their principle, the FIA is basically run by only a few men, that can be good, but can also destroy a lot of things.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:46 am 
Offline
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:50 pm
Posts: 571
Location: On top of old smokey
Has thanked: 7 times
jdh wrote:
Are you kidding yourself? This will be an absolute re-run of the IRL/Champ Car collapse. F1 will kill itself if this goes through.


I sadly agree. There are a lot of differences but if it goes through it will probably play out the same: a long war that will only cost people, money, fans, sponsors, etc.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:53 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15439
Has thanked: 861 times
Been thanked: 639 times
Bernie and Max are two evil characters who wouldn't mind turning up to Melbourne next year and standing on an empty grid. The not so awesome twosome should sit down and ponder what they have just done.

I really hope they can find a solution and I think that they will.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:08 am 
Offline
Australian - All the animals look so strange
Australian - All the animals look so strange
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:38 pm
Posts: 528
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 2 times
I'm amazed to see no Ferrari press release regarding the FIA's confirmation of no change to budget cap. I have a feeling they are just going to lay low and agree to the new championship.

I personally think that FOTA would fall apart under last minute in-or-out conditions with teams choosing to save themselves regardless of FOTA stuff. As seen with Williams and Force India (granted they are private teams - but they don't have that heavy power of money and influence to last to the final minute to go for themselves and choose safety).

I expect all the teams to sign up last minute with the exception of maybe Renault and Toyota. And the lack of a Ferrari press release after confirmation of budget cap remaining hints at this. Ferrari know the FIA will keep them in as they signed a few years ago to be there. They already "confirmed" them as an entrant. So Ferrari know they are safe on the grid and play the "We're with FOTA until the end" card and still be safe in F1 when FOTA breaks down at the last minute.

FOTA isn't a single nation. It's a group of businesses. They'll do what's best for their company - not what's best for a pressure group. FOTA was a good idea and has done good things (even if they had only postponed the medals system). But I think it's an everyone for themselves when the SHTF group cloaked in a fake veil of unity.

My two cents.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:24 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Been thanked: 2 times
We have to see what happens...

Image

:p


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 224 posts ]  Go to page Previous 17 8 9 10 11 12 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited