TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:23 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 729 posts ]  Go to page Previous 131 32 33 34 3537 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 6:39 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 5778
Location: NRW
Has thanked: 2727 times
Been thanked: 474 times
Ferrari have protested Verstappen's result on the basis of him crossing the line. I have to say, they have a strong case for once.


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 7:38 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 15979
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 923 times
Perez achieved some interesting statistics. Being his first at Monaco, is also his first on wet weather and he's also the most successful mexican in F1 history

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2023: throwing cautions and red flags unnecessarily


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 7:58 pm 
Offline
Official TBK Rain Predictor
Official TBK Rain Predictor
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:18 pm
Posts: 15391
Location: Quite rainy Antwerp
Has thanked: 292 times
Been thanked: 492 times
So the delayed start was NOT because of the rain: https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/power ... /10313532/

Also: rules for pit lane exit don't seem to apply anymore.


:lol: :flag:


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 8:48 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:32 pm
Posts: 12321
Location: Braga/Porto - Portugal
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Conclusions of the Stewards:
Having considered the various statements made by the parties, and having reviewed the case of
Car 18 in the 2021 Monaco Grand Prix, which involved a similar situation to this, the Stewards
determine the following:
1. Article 2.1 of the 2022 Formula One Sporting Regulations provides that “All…officials..undertake
to observe all the provisions of …the Code, …..the Formula One Sporting Regulations…”.
2. This places an obligation on the Race Director (and the Stewards) to comply with those regulations.
3. Accordingly, the Notesissued by the Race Director cannot contradict the Code or the Formula One
Sporting Regulations

4. Article 5 c) of Chapter IV of Appendix L of the Code stipulates that at the pit exit a car “must not
cross” the line.
5. In this case, the car did not “cross” the line – to do so it would have needed to have a full wheel to
the left of the yellow line.
6. Accordingly the driver did not breach the relevant section of the Code and this takes precedent
over any interpretation of the Notes.
The Protest is therefore dismissed and the Protest Fee is forfeited.

Aka he stepped on the line but didn't cross it.


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 8:59 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8765
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 836 times
codename_47 wrote:
Young people who haven't done their history:

OMG THIS IS SO EXCITING ANYTHING COULD HAPPEN

Jaded F1 fans who have seen 1992, 2001 and 2012:

Yeah this is the finishing order

From a fellow old fart: fuck you sir :p , I like trains of frustrated drivers and just you wait, something will happen some day. Still always more fun than gaps. And arguably (my opinion that I know is extreme) more fun than regular tracks where passes are made quickly and then gaps created by the faster guys to the finish.

Motor races should create opportunity for a slower driver to outsmart and win, and only Monaco allows this :excited:

(Also, add 2002 and a train of 4 cars for the lead behind Coulthard's slowly dying engine).


Last edited by Coldtyre on Sun May 29, 2022 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 9:01 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 15979
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 923 times
what about that race in Jarama (pretty much a Monaco without barriers) when Gilles held the biggest train from the lead in F1 history

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2023: throwing cautions and red flags unnecessarily


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 9:02 pm 
Offline
Founder of the Yaytree
Founder of the Yaytree
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 28000
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not near DEGA :( )
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 1862 times
Coldtyre wrote:
codename_47 wrote:
Young people who haven't done their history:

OMG THIS IS SO EXCITING ANYTHING COULD HAPPEN

Jaded F1 fans who have seen 1992, 2001 and 2012:

Yeah this is the finishing order

From a fellow old fart: fuck you sir :p , I like trains of frustrated drivers and just you wait, something will happen some day.

(Also, add 2002 and a train of 4 cars for the lead behind Coulthard's slowly dying engine).


It'll be harder to think of passes for the lead or even podium places than the obvious races where the leader is a lot slower but no-one can get by them

I know Montoya passed 1 car in 2004 and Lewis again sneaked through someone in 2011/2 early in the race that made us all think "oh, is DRS gonna change Monaco and make it possible to pass here!?" (lol...nope)
Then there was that 2005 race where the tyres were really suffering during the no tyre change year where there was some late race drama and Williams throwing it down the inside of Renaults in wild moves....

That'll be it, I expect

_________________
RIP Birmingham Wheels: here's some of the crash videos I recorded when it was there:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIaKIE ... 5t9d5PvoHA

Twitter:

http://www.twitter.com/paulhadsley


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 9:55 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8765
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 836 times
So Verstappen case has been explained above.

For Ocon: he went to the stewards and they explained that a new rule this year penalises the driver outside if there's already a car inside. They stated it's new and this would've been a racing incident last year. They stated they also don't really think it's a good rule but they have to apply it.

These were Ocon's words to french TV after the race. If this is true, I can't wait to see the shitstorm from future similar contacts this year, with higher stakes at play. :lol:


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 10:18 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:02 am
Posts: 5773
Location: 't Stad
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 595 times
I was always opposed to that old rule. No, it's not because you get your nose next to the car in front that you have made the pass. But the driver in front must realise he can't steer in to the apex when there's a car next to him. Plenty of cases before, when the driver in front just steers like there's no one there, they make contact and the driver behind was always seen as the one who made the error. And it was bullshit.

But it's also stupid that if the exact same manoeuvre happened last year, Hamilton would have been penalised and this year it's Ocon.


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 10:21 pm 
Offline
Founder of the Yaytree
Founder of the Yaytree
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:27 pm
Posts: 28000
Location: Birmingham, UK (Not near DEGA :( )
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 1862 times
Does that mean the Vettel intimidation block on a car alongside him(Malaysia 2017, Brazil 2019) amid others, is now illegal too

_________________
RIP Birmingham Wheels: here's some of the crash videos I recorded when it was there:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIaKIE ... 5t9d5PvoHA

Twitter:

http://www.twitter.com/paulhadsley


Top
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2022 11:00 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:26 am
Posts: 5263
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 261 times
Fabs wrote:
So the delayed start was NOT because of the rain: https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/power ... /10313532/


On one hand, we cannot criticize race direction as they couldn't do anything else.

On the other hand, however, it is very concerning that a track is under the risk of power outage when it rains. That's some terrible job around.


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 12:44 am 
Offline
Bronze Member
Bronze Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 11:13 am
Posts: 543
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 103 times
So as far as I can see Mick Schumacher has written off two chassis now. I don't even think Mazepin would have done this amount of damage, surely he's in trouble?


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 6:52 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8765
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 836 times
codename_47 wrote:
Does that mean the Vettel intimidation block on a car alongside him(Malaysia 2017, Brazil 2019) amid others, is now illegal too

This is why this shouldn't be legally enforced if the overlap is 50-50-ish. If it's a blatant turn-in like Schumacher 94+97, penalty to car in front. If you punt someone with the wing or front wheel vs rear wheel, penalty to guy behind.

For everything in-between, and yesterday was one of those, racing incident and call it a day. Not every incident needs a penalty, that's what the Internet forgets while looking for the "responsible". They'll sort it out on track and as Kimi says, it evens out over a mong period of time.


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 7:35 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:34 pm
Posts: 2347
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 24 times
Do the stewards look at a bit more than just the corner - Hamilton was alongside Ocon on the straight, then was braking earlier for the tighter inside line, so Ocon should really have known he was there and left some space at the apex - different to Hamilton being behind and sticking his nose into the apex at the last minute.

Agree a racing incident would have been fairest, especially as Ocon was at risk of a puncture from turning in on Hamilton.
EAS wrote:
Fabs wrote:
So the delayed start was NOT because of the rain: https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/power ... /10313532/


On one hand, we cannot criticize race direction as they couldn't do anything else.

On the other hand, however, it is very concerning that a track is under the risk of power outage when it rains. That's some terrible job around.
Pretty bad communication not to get that info out during the 1 hour delay

Sent from my CPH2005 using Tapatalk


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 8:40 am 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:32 pm
Posts: 12321
Location: Braga/Porto - Portugal
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 267 times
peterohanrahanrahan wrote:
So as far as I can see Mick Schumacher has written off two chassis now. I don't even think Mazepin would have done this amount of damage, surely he's in trouble?

On the flip side, Mick can fight for points whilst I doubt Fittipaldi will be able to get in that mix.


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 8:44 am 
Offline
Isnt CCTV a Chinese television channel
Isnt CCTV a Chinese television channel
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:06 pm
Posts: 4544
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 268 times
amq55 wrote:
peterohanrahanrahan wrote:
So as far as I can see Mick Schumacher has written off two chassis now. I don't even think Mazepin would have done this amount of damage, surely he's in trouble?

On the flip side, Mick can fight for points whilst I doubt Fittipaldi will be able to get in that mix.


He also brings the only Sponsor the team has.


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 10:56 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8205
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 564 times
Beezle wrote:
amq55 wrote:
peterohanrahanrahan wrote:
So as far as I can see Mick Schumacher has written off two chassis now. I don't even think Mazepin would have done this amount of damage, surely he's in trouble?

On the flip side, Mick can fight for points whilst I doubt Fittipaldi will be able to get in that mix.


He also brings the only Sponsor the team has.


If sponsor income - wrecks = 0 what would be the use?


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 11:48 am 
Offline
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
2011 TBK-Light most negative awards, award winner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:14 am
Posts: 15361
Has thanked: 858 times
Been thanked: 637 times
Rather convenient that a "power outage" prevents the FIA conducting their precious red flag standing start :roll:

_________________
Follow me on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/135625678@N06/


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 12:10 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 15979
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 923 times
Beezle wrote:
amq55 wrote:
peterohanrahanrahan wrote:
So as far as I can see Mick Schumacher has written off two chassis now. I don't even think Mazepin would have done this amount of damage, surely he's in trouble?

On the flip side, Mick can fight for points whilst I doubt Fittipaldi will be able to get in that mix.


He also brings the only Sponsor the team has.


and has the Ferrari backing. Only gets out if the Scuderia says so

has somebody on social media confirmed the power outage or they just came up with that to justify their blunders and place the blame on race organizers again?

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2023: throwing cautions and red flags unnecessarily


Top
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2022 12:14 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:26 am
Posts: 5263
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 261 times
Well, at least for me, the information of power outage came from different sources than any official F1 channel. Can't see journalists coming with a fake story only to make F1 actions seem reasonable.

By the way, it was the same lack of transparency that we saw on Saturday's UEFA Champions League Final, in which UEFA used such dubious wording that made it seem like the fans were to take the blame on the delayed match start.


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 729 posts ]  Go to page Previous 131 32 33 34 3537 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited