TBK-Light.com

Motorsport videos and chat.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2024 11:29 am

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6683 posts ]  Go to page Previous 183 84 85 86 87335 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:24 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
Isn't cocaine or heroin giving you the idea you're invincible or something like that?

That would help I reckon. Taking away the fear of getting hurt might give that little bit extra you need.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:34 am 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:34 am
Posts: 10324
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 396 times
I think most drivers have mastered over coming that by they time they reach the big time :lol:

_________________
"An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government"


3x TBKL rFactor Hillclimb champion


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:49 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
Juihi wrote:
I think most drivers have mastered over coming that by they time they reach the big time :lol:


Kamui Kobayashi made some moves that others didn't dare :lol:

That's what I meant to say... Most of the fear is gone but it still is some sort of a factor. We probably all have driven some sort of racing game or simulator. We can take that extra bit of risk because if we crash hard we load the last save-file.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:26 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8769
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 618 times
Been thanked: 836 times
micha wrote:
Isn't cocaine or heroin giving you the idea you're invincible or something like that?

That would help I reckon. Taking away the fear of getting hurt might give that little bit extra you need.

Yes, I read that in a magazine back when they started testing drivers (in 1999).

In fact, these drugs can enhance reflexes and ability. However, no doctor will ever endorse that, because the over-confidence it provides will inevitably lead to crashes, so it's a definite no-no given the danger vs the small speed benefit it might give.

Regarding Maldonado, I don't think anything will change. Unless PDVSA is privatised and the new owners decide to change their racing involvment, but that isn't happening any time soon (or else, massive rioting).


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:33 am 
Offline
Russian Propaganda Machine - Benelux Division
Russian Propaganda Machine - Benelux Division
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:05 pm
Posts: 7552
Location: home
Has thanked: 1252 times
Been thanked: 391 times
regarding possible question marks over Maldonado's career after H. Chavez's passing. I understand payment had to be upfront. So he should be okay for this season at least.

Also, I find Maldonado to be underrated. He is very agressive and unlikeable, but possibly the most talented pay-driver I have seen driving.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:47 am 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:45 pm
Posts: 1145
Location: Location. Location.
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 73 times
There's no faulting his speed - his race-craft and ideology have been questionable a good few times, but I don't think there are any questions about his speed ... he even started keeping his nose clean towards the end of last year (and I don't think he was to blame for the incident with Webber) which if he continues doing and doesn't lose the speed, could make him a really good driver, as well as a very quick one as he is now.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:27 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:26 am
Posts: 5303
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Has thanked: 254 times
Been thanked: 262 times
I see no problems for Maldonado this year regarding his funding. But we have to wait and see the next venezuelan elections, that may happen within a month, to try to figure out what is going to happen with the whole PDVSA funding for venezuelan drivers.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:06 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:08 pm
Posts: 16186
Location: Joined 1st TBK: November 25th, 2005 ***Joelma Building, Sao Paulo***
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 944 times
micha wrote:
Isn't cocaine or heroin giving you the idea you're invincible or something like that?

That would help I reckon. Taking away the fear of getting hurt might give that little bit extra you need.


James Hunt would be so fucked if he raced nowadays and had to run those tests...

_________________
Motorsports trend for 2024: everything is a bad taste joke now


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:58 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
Posts: 6260
Location: Birmingham, UK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 434 times
Don't mean to start yet another DRS debate, But there will be 2 DRS zones at every track apart from Monaco & Suzuka this year.
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2013/03/06/b ... es-2013-2/

Looking through some of the locations for the new zones, Why do we need a DRS zone into turn 1 at Austin? There was plenty of great racing & overtaking there last year!

One down the start/finish straght at Interlagos, Why?


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:08 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
Yeah, I don't get why those massive straights need DRS really. I've already said that I'd prefer free use and every driver getting a set usage, such as in FR3.5.

_________________
Dan Wheldon | 1978 - 2011


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:00 pm 
Offline
Russian Propaganda Machine - Benelux Division
Russian Propaganda Machine - Benelux Division
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:05 pm
Posts: 7552
Location: home
Has thanked: 1252 times
Been thanked: 391 times
Quote:
Hungaroring Pit straight Pit straight and second straight


I guess they mean that uphill section, where Massa had the crash? Or do they mean the 'straight' right after the first turn?

Sepang should be fun.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:25 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member

Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:48 am
Posts: 25040
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 420 times
It's the straight after T1.

_________________
Dan Wheldon | 1978 - 2011


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:52 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:48 pm
Posts: 10355
Has thanked: 294 times
Been thanked: 280 times
That's a simple drive by down the straight at Interlagos then. Why? Sigh.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:47 pm 
Offline
The Finnish Paul Page
The Finnish Paul Page
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Racing is in my blood
Has thanked: 725 times
Been thanked: 563 times
De Cesaris fan wrote:
That's a simple drive by down the straight at Interlagos then. Why? Sigh.



Because Kimi's move on Schumacher was potentially dangerous. /FIA

_________________
"Indy doesn't give you a second chance. You have to earn it."


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:04 pm 
Offline
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 24720
Location: Guildford, UK
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 721 times
Formula 1 has already been linked to Dr. Fuentes by someone who knows what they are talking about, so it's not surprising to see the WADA suddenly get off their arses with regards to F1.

Formula 1 currently does not have it's own list of banned substances; it simply copy and pastes the IOC list. It was Sid Watkins who said that the IOC list was not suitable for the job (as there are substances on there which would not do anything for F1 drivers), and that the FIA needed to come up with its own list.

_________________
Dan Wheldon ¦ 1978-2011
Marco Simoncelli ¦ 1987-2011
Jules Bianchi ¦ 1989-2015
Justin Wilson ¦ 1978-2015

Yeah, I know he's mad and I don't care. I do not care. I did not care then. I do not care now. I'm here to race him.


Top
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:25 pm 
Offline
The Finnish Paul Page
The Finnish Paul Page
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Racing is in my blood
Has thanked: 725 times
Been thanked: 563 times
RtN wrote:
Formula 1 has already been linked to Dr. Fuentes by someone who knows what they are talking about, so it's not surprising to see the WADA suddenly get off their arses with regards to F1.

Formula 1 currently does not have it's own list of banned substances; it simply copy and pastes the IOC list. It was Sid Watkins who said that the IOC list was not suitable for the job (as there are substances on there which would not do anything for F1 drivers), and that the FIA needed to come up with its own list.



It's a good point from the late dr. Watkins, but since it's been over a decade without any actions what so ever, I think it would be better to go as the things are. I'd hate to see when the levee breaks with F1 doping-scandals from the past in a Lance Armstrong style. I'd rather be in denial or unaware...like Norwegians are with their 90's skiing legends.

_________________
"Indy doesn't give you a second chance. You have to earn it."


Top
PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline
Silver Member
Silver Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 1339
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 137 times
RtN wrote:
Formula 1 has already been linked to Dr. Fuentes by someone who knows what they are talking about, so it's not surprising to see the WADA suddenly get off their arses with regards to F1.

Formula 1 currently does not have it's own list of banned substances; it simply copy and pastes the IOC list. It was Sid Watkins who said that the IOC list was not suitable for the job (as there are substances on there which would not do anything for F1 drivers), and that the FIA needed to come up with its own list.


i wonder what would have happened if half of the grid resulted positive to the tests. WC starting in a week and a half. Half of the teams without drivers. Without drivers you dont have their sponsor paying. Withouy sponsors you dont have money. without money you dont have F1. So? massive cover up?


Top
PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:23 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:12 am
Posts: 8235
Has thanked: 157 times
Been thanked: 564 times
cambridge wrote:
RtN wrote:
Formula 1 has already been linked to Dr. Fuentes by someone who knows what they are talking about, so it's not surprising to see the WADA suddenly get off their arses with regards to F1.

Formula 1 currently does not have it's own list of banned substances; it simply copy and pastes the IOC list. It was Sid Watkins who said that the IOC list was not suitable for the job (as there are substances on there which would not do anything for F1 drivers), and that the FIA needed to come up with its own list.


i wonder what would have happened if half of the grid resulted positive to the tests. WC starting in a week and a half. Half of the teams without drivers. Without drivers you dont have their sponsor paying. Withouy sponsors you dont have money. without money you dont have F1. So? massive cover up?



Like all other sports.....The lit has been blown in Cycling...Once that shitstorm has passed wait until the next sport will cause the next shitstorm.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:46 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 8769
Location: Paris
Has thanked: 618 times
Been thanked: 836 times
Again, an F1 is not a bicycle. Driving under influence leads to damage and injury, no matter the drug.

It's good to control the drivers (for their own sake!), but any potential cheaters know they're better off trying to tweak the mechanic rather than the human inside.


Top
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:28 am 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:32 pm
Posts: 2501
Location: CHOO CHOO
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 61 times
cambridge wrote:
RtN wrote:
Formula 1 has already been linked to Dr. Fuentes by someone who knows what they are talking about, so it's not surprising to see the WADA suddenly get off their arses with regards to F1.

Formula 1 currently does not have it's own list of banned substances; it simply copy and pastes the IOC list. It was Sid Watkins who said that the IOC list was not suitable for the job (as there are substances on there which would not do anything for F1 drivers), and that the FIA needed to come up with its own list.


i wonder what would have happened if half of the grid resulted positive to the tests. WC starting in a week and a half. Half of the teams without drivers. Without drivers you dont have their sponsor paying. Withouy sponsors you dont have money. without money you dont have F1. So? massive cover up?

Wouldn't it just be treated like a driver injury depending on the punishment?

_________________
ptclaus98 wrote:
So I guess you guys are pretty stoked about the tumors, then


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6683 posts ]  Go to page Previous 183 84 85 86 87335 Next

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited