TBK-Light.com
https://www.tbk-light.com/phpBB3/

2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
https://www.tbk-light.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=9549		 Page 81 of 151
Author:  mclaren2008 [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 12:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
Nah the tight narrow one. Citti d'Aria or something.
Author:  kals [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 12:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
That narrow but fast time trial course? Yeah, that was pretty cool. I still preferred Seattle though.
Author:  mclaren2008 [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 3:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
Seattle wasn't my favorite
Author:  racer612008 [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
hasMaldonadocrashedtoday.com rumored if Haryanto's funding runs dry at Manor
http://www.grandprix247.com/2016/06/04/ ... -says-mom/
Author:  Tobias [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 7:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
I liked the railroad tracks on the Seattle track.
Author:  JJ [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 8:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
racer612008 wrote:
hasMaldonadocrashedtoday.com rumored if Haryanto's funding runs dry at Manor
http://www.grandprix247.com/2016/06/04/ ... -says-mom/

Maldonado needs to have a midfield car to cause proper damage in the races. Though at the start he might go past (or over) quite many cars.
Author:  Whofan [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
mclaren2008 wrote:
Nah the tight narrow one. Citti d'Aria or something.


Yeah I used to love that one too. Shame they never brought it back
Author:  DinoMarko93 [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
JJ wrote:
racer612008 wrote:
hasMaldonadocrashedtoday.com rumored if Haryanto's funding runs dry at Manor
http://www.grandprix247.com/2016/06/04/ ... -says-mom/

Maldonado needs to have a midfield car to cause proper damage in the races. Though at the start he might go past (or over) quite many cars.



To be honest,I'm sure Pastor would do so much better job then Palmer in the Renault.
Author:  codename_47 [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 11:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
It says a lot about some of the drivers in f1 that we're getting nostalgic about freaking maldanado :slaphead:
Author:  OS [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 11:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
mclaren2008 wrote:
Seattle wasn't my favorite


It was one of my favourites, I used to love doing that Enduro in GT3. The Italian TT course was good too though, but in a more intense way. Way more nostalgia for this than Maldonado.
Author:  LucasWheldon [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
Seattle was quite fun to drive, specially on the hills, just didn't liked that kink before start/finish line

but for me the best track to drive was Grand Valley Speedway
Author:  alex1369 [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 2:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
What about Midfield or Red rock valley?
Author:  LucasWheldon [ Sun Jun 05, 2016 3:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
the most suitable track from Gran Turismo for F1 races is the Special Stage Route 11
Image

so many hairpins
Author:  siggy [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
Dear lord, gran turismo. ..... How about Solitude for Grand Prix Legends? Old Spa would be mega.

But Avusring, Norisring and Brno would be fun as well.
Author:  micha [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
DinoMarko93 wrote:
JJ wrote:
racer612008 wrote:
hasMaldonadocrashedtoday.com rumored if Haryanto's funding runs dry at Manor
http://www.grandprix247.com/2016/06/04/ ... -says-mom/

Maldonado needs to have a midfield car to cause proper damage in the races. Though at the start he might go past (or over) quite many cars.



To be honest,I'm sure Pastor would do so much better job then Palmer in the Renault.



You make that sound like its a proper challenge.
Author:  Coldtyre [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
Don't get your hopes up, guys, I feel it's way too good to be true to have these walls being the actual track limits.

You'll have some curbing on the inside at least, if not on the exit as well. Or even worse, on the outside at the braking zone so that these little snowflakes don't accidentally brush the wall during braking or at exit.
Author:  LucasWheldon [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
yeah FIA demands standart kerbing

could have those tall one that we used to see at Adelaide
Author:  webbsy [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
coldtyre wrote:
Don't get your hopes up, guys, I feel it's way too good to be true to have these walls being the actual track limits.

You'll have some curbing on the inside at least, if not on the exit as well. Or even worse, on the outside at the braking zone so that these little snowflakes don't accidentally brush the wall during braking or at exit.


Yep, that's my fear. Valencia MK2.
Author:  kals [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
Mk2? Mk3 more like. Mk2 was used a couple of rounds ago in Sochi.
Author:  Coldtyre [ Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2016 Random F1 Discussion Thread
I have the feeling that the FIA, as a regulating agent, should have no incentive in making it easier for the participants?

Take the UCI for example. Mandating helmets is okay for the cyclists safety.

But the excessive curbing we see in slow safe corners (for example at Monaco, or at the exit of slow hairpins) is the equivalent of the UCI removing the biggest climbs from races because they are too hard on riders and can cause them to lose the race if they don't handle them correctly.
Page 81 of 151 All times are UTC+01:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/